School Debate Societies and Their Contribution to the Development of Socio-Emotional Skills: A Case Study in Latin America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.29-3.20113Keywords:
Attitudes, socio-emotional competencies, debate, mediation, social values, SDG 4, quality education, comprehension skills, SDG 16, peace, justice and strong institutions, nonviolentAbstract
Aim. This research article presents the results of a study focused on determining the contribution of school debate societies in the development of socio-emotional skills in ten public and private educational institutions in four Latin American countries. Methodology. For the purpose of operationalizing this objective, the research was conducted using a qualitative approach and a multiple case study design to obtain a broader perspective of the object of study. Accordingly, techniques and instruments such as questionnaires and in-depth interviews, discussion groups, and participant observation were applied during school debate sessions with 118 students and 12 teachers from the targeted organizations throughout the different phases involved in the selected design. Results. Among the main results, we highlight that debating societies are conducive scenarios for the development of skills related to assertiveness, self-regulation, empathy, active listening, and critical thinking, which results in the cultivation of values and attitudes from the promotion of recognition, respect, and responsibility towards others. Conclusions. Based on these findings, it became evident that debate societies function as educational spaces that help shape citizens capable of participating actively and responsibly in democratic life. In this regard, the diversity and plurality present in debates are consolidated as pedagogical resources that enhance learning and democratic coexistence.
Downloads
References
Alzate-Henao, G. P., Bedoya-Rojas, M. M., Fajardo-Sandoval, A. M., Hoyos-Mejía, A. del P., & Ocampo-Flórez, E. (2020). Emociones, conflicto y educación: Bases para pensar la educación emocional para la paz. Eleuthera, 22(2), 246-265. https://doi.org/10.17151/eleu.2020.22.2.15
Alés Canales, J. A. (2022). El valor pedagógico del debate académico en Educación Secundaria y Universitaria [Tesis de maestría, Universidad de Valladolid]. https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/54107
Asociación Chilena de Debate [ACHDE]. (2023). Quiénes Somos. https://www.asociacionchilenadedebate.cl/
Asociación Nacional de Debate (ANDE). (2023). Home. https://www.debate.org.co/
Asociación Panameña de Debate (ASPADE). (2023). Proyectos. https://www.aspadepanama.com/proyectos
Bartanen, M. D., & Littlefield, R. S. (2015). Competitive speech and debate how play influenced American Educational Practice. American Journal of Play, 7(2), 155-173. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1053419.pdf
Bernal Bernal, H. F. (2020). La enseñanza mediante el debate en la formación inicial docente: Dificultades y oportunidades [Tesis de maestría, Pontifica Universidad Javeriana]. https://repository.javeriana.edu.co/items/16a9231e-ff59-4fb8-a4a0-0163b063b766
Betancourth Zambrano, S., Tabares Díaz, Y., & Martínez Daza, V. (2021). Desarrollo del pensamiento crítico a través del debate crítico: Una mirada cualitativa. Revista Interamericana de Investigación, Educación y Pedagogía, 14(2), 373-400. Universidad Santo Tomás. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5610/561070063014/
Burke, E., & Samuels, A. P. I. (2014). The early life correspondence and writings of the Rt. Hon. Edmund Burke. Cambridge University Press.
Cevallos Ortiz, S. A., Bravo Sánchez, S. G., Feijoo Mendieta, D. A., & Gavilánez García, M. M. (2025). El debate en el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico en adolescentes. Sinergia Académica, 8(3), 39-56. https://sinergiaacademica.com/index.php/sa/article/view/557/1169
Collaborative for Academic Social and Emotional Learning (CASEL). (2020). Marco de SEL de Casel: ¿Cuáles son las áreas de competencias principales y dónde se promueven? https://casel-org.translate.goog/casel-sel-framework-11-2020/?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=es&_x_tr_hl=es&_x_tr_pto=sge
Coller, X. (2000). Estudio de casos. CIS.
Corbit, K. W. (2017). A theory-centered model of debate assessment: The rhetorical judging paradigm [Thesis doctoral, University of Alabama Libraries]. http://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/3535
Debate al Cole. (s. f.). Home [Página de Facebook]. Facebook. Recuperado en 2024, de https://www.facebook.com/DebateAlCole/
Dewangga, D. A., Rosadi, I., Muna, N. M., & Indriani, L. (2024) Investigating critical thinking skills in debate class through the use of the case method. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1). 117-127. https://doi.org/10.32332/joelt.v12i1.9266
Diez de Fex, A. (2017). Process tracing of the Latin American debate movement [Thesis of Master, Central European University]. https://www.academia.edu/35395082/Process_tracing_of_the_Latin_American_debate_movement
Dillard-Knox, T. Y. (2014). Against the grain: The challenges of black discourse within intercollegiate policy debate Electronic [Tesis de maestría, University of Louisville]. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2161
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301
Guzmán, J. (2019). Análisis del debate de competición académico -estrategias discursivas [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad de Córdoba].
Hamaker, J. (2019). Exploring motivations for intercollegiate debate participation [Thesis of Master, Missouri State University]. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/3386/
Jiménez Becerra, I. (2024). Metodología de la investigación: Triángulos para su construcción. Ediciones de la U.
Liga Peruana de Debate Escolar [LPDE]. (2023). Home. https://cidedidactica.org/lpde/
Mejía, J. F., Rodríguez, G. I., Guerra, N., Bustamante, A., Chaparro, M. P., & Castellanos, M. (2016). Paso a paso: Programa de Educación Socioemocional. Cuaderno para estudiante (grados 1 - 11). Banco Mundial.
Parcher, J. (1998). The value of debate: Adapted from the Report of the Philodemic Debate Society, Georgetown University. The Palm Beach / Martin Debate Portal. https://pbcfl.net/wp-content/uploads/Article-The-Value-of-Debate.pdf
Quiroz Millán, L. E. & Molina Montoya, N. P. (2024). Sociedades de debate generadoras de cultura(s) de paz: Estudio de caso en diez colegios de Panamá, Colombia, Perú y Chile. Revista Cultura de Paz, 8, 157-183. https://doi.org/10.58508/cultpaz.v8.209
Rahim, M. A. (2001). Managing conflict in organizations. Quorum Books. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400682117
Sánchez-Corrales N. (2019). Cotidianidades y solidaridades políticas: Una cartografía de la educación para la paz en Colombia. Revista Ñanduty, 7(11), 17-45. https://doi.org/10.30612/nty.v7i11.10769
Sánchez Fernández, S. (2011). Hacia la interculturalidad desde la cultura de paz. Una perspectiva educativa. Dedica. Revista de Educação e Humanidades (1), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.30827/dreh.v0i1.7162
Sánchez Fernández, S., Pérez de Guzmán, V., Rebolledo Gámez, T., & Rodríguez Casdo, R. (2019). La cultura de paz y conflictos: Implicaciones socioeducativas. Collectivus, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 6(1), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.15648/Coll.1.2019.13
Snider, A. C. (2011). A short guide to competitive debate formats: University Level Competition. Debating Resources for the World. https://www.uvm.edu/~debate/dcpdf/debateformatguide.pdf
Solano Villán, L. G. (2022). El debate escolar en la formación para la ciudadanía: Un análisis desde la teoría y la práctica [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Jde Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano]. https://expeditiorepositorio.utadeo.edu.co/items/223fdea9-18e7-4ab0-a66c-1366335f867d
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. En N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443-466). Sage.
Suárez Cretton, X. & Castro Méndez, N. (2022). Competencias socioemocionales y resiliencia de estudiantes de escuelas vulnerables y su relación con el rendimiento académico. Revista de Psicología, 40(2), 879-904). https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.202202.009
Tuvilla Rayo, J. (2004). Cultura de paz y educación. En B. Molina Rueda, & F. A. Muñoz Muñoz (Eds.), Manual de paz y conflictos (pp. 387-426). Editorial Universidad de Granada.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (Unesco). (2021). Habilidades socioemocionales en América Latina y el Caribe: Estudio regional comparativo y explicativo (ERCE 2019). Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. http://umc.minedu.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Informe-regional-HSE.pdf
Vasilachis de Gialdino, I. (Coord.). (2006). Estrategias de investigación cualitativa. Editorial Gedisa.
Woods, C. (2010). Women debating society: Negotiating difference in historical argument cultures [Tesis doctoral, University of Pittsburgh]. http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10214
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and aplicattions: Design and methods. SAGE.
Young, K. M., Henry, A., & Koch, J. (2017). Why forensics matters: The development of emotional competence in competitors. National Forensic Journal, 35(1), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.56816/0749-1042.1031
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luz Elena Quiroz-Millán

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:











The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 

