University Education: Curriculum Flexibility in Question: Study of University Institutions in Argentina and Uruguay
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.30-1.21276Keywords:
University curriculum, higher education, educational planning, right to education, curriculum, SDG 4, quality education, education policiesAbstract
Objective. This article analyzes the policies for making university curricula more flexible and their translation into concrete decisions within study plans, based on a comparative study of 64 degree programs at the University of the Republic (UDELAR), Uruguay, and the National University of Río Negro (UNRN), Argentina. Methodology. through a review of institutional documents, plans, and curricula in effect as of 2023, the meanings attributed to flexibility in both contexts are qualitatively examined. Relevant variables for comparison are identified and analyzed using bivariate tables and graphs, considering the area of knowledge and the duration of the degree programs. Results analysis. the results show that less than half of the plans explicitly incorporate the notion of flexibility as a feature of their design. At UDELAR, strategies such as optional and elective courses, the incorporation of common subjects, and credit-based organization are prominent, while at UNRN these strategies are incipient or residual. Furthermore, both universities exhibit a highly structured transition from the first to the second year, resulting in a process with limited flexibility. Conclusions. Overall, the findings reveal uneven progress in incorporating curricular flexibility and persistent tensions in the organization of educational pathways. Rather than offering recommendations, this article provides critical insights situated within the context of recent transformations in higher education and the relationship between curricular policies and their implementation.
Downloads
References
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Revised Edition). Rowman & Littlefield.
Cabrera, A. F., Pérez Mejías, P., & López Fernández, L. (2014). Evolución de las perspectivas de estudio de la retención universitaria en los EE.UU.: Bases conceptuales y puntos de inflexión. En P. Figuera Gazo (Ed.), Persistir con éxito en la universidad: De la investigación a la acción (pp. 15-40), Laertes. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261699533_Evolucion_de_perspectivas_en_el_estudio_de_la_retencion_universitaria_en_los_EEUU_Bases_conceptuales_y_puntos_de_inflexion
Carrillo Hernández, M. T. D. J. & Benavides Martínez, B. (2022). Percepciones de docentes sobre la flexibilidad curricular: Un estudio de caso. Revista Educación, 46(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v46i1.45086
Crosa, L. & Soubirón, E. (2008). Indicadores de flexibilidad en carreras universitarias de grado. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 44(7), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie4472179
de Clercq, M., Galand, B., Hospel, V., & Frenay, M. (2021). Bridging contextual and individual factors of academic achievement: A multi-level analysis of diversity in the transition to higher education. Frontline Learning Research, 9(2), 96-120. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v9i2.671
Díaz-Barriga, F. & Barrón, M. C. (2014). Curricular changes in higher education in Mexico (2002-2012). Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 3(2), 58-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jct.v3n2p58
Fernández, T., Trevignani, V., Cardozo, S., Pacífico, A., Marques, A., Kunrath, R., & da Cunha, P. (2022). Perfil de ingreso, puntos de bifurcación en la trayectoria y desafiliación en el ingreso a la universidad: Un estudio de caso comparado en tres universidades de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. https://hdl.handle.net/11185/6585
Fullan, M. & Hargreaves, A. (1999). La escuela que queremos. Los objetivos por los que vale la pena luchar. SEP. https://zonaescolar98.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/la-escuela-que-queremos.pdf
García Ospina, N. (2008). Currículo y flexibilidad curricular ¿currículo: Sendero o territorio?. Universidad de Antioquía.
Herrera, A. & Didriksson, A. (1999). La construcción curricular: Iinnovación, flexibilidad y competencias. Revista Educación Superior y Sociedad (ESS), 10(2), 29-52. https://ess.iesalc.unesco.org/index.php/ess3/article/view/146
Kift, S. (2009). Articulating a transition pedagogy to scaffold and to enhance the first year student learning experience in Australian higher education (Final report for ALTC senior fellowship program). Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
McInnis, C. (2001). Researching the first year experience: Where to from here? Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360125188
Ministerio de Educación. (2023, noviembre 21). Resolución N.° 2598/2023. Sistema argentino de créditos académicos universitarios. Boletín Oficial de la República de Argentina. https://www.unc.edu.ar/sites/default/files/RM%202598-23.pdf
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (UNESCO). (2013). Clasificación Internacional Normalizada de la Educación CINE 2011. Instituto de Estadística de la UNESCO (UIS). file:///Users/liana/Downloads/220782spa%20(1).pdf
Tavela, D. (Secretaría) & Marquina M. (Coord.). (2018): RTF Reconocimiento de trayectos formativos en la educación superior: Una política de articulación del sistema para brindar más opciones de formación al estudiante. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura, Ciencia y Tecnología. http://www.bnm.me.gov.ar/giga1/documentos/EL006460.pdf
Terigi, F. (2014). Trayectorias escolares e inclusión educativa: Del enfoque individual al desafío para las políticas educativas. En Á. Marchesi, R. Blanco, & L. Hernández (Coords.), Avances y desafíos de la educación inclusiva en Iberoamérica (pp. 71-87). OEI. https://universidadyhumanidad.itm.edu.co/BancoConocimiento/DocumentosOtrasEntidades/Educaci%C3%B3n%20inclusicas%20Metas%20educativas%202021.pdf#page=73
Universidad de la República. Comisión Sectorial de Enseñanza. Unidad Académica. (2011). Ordenanza de estudios de grado y otros programas de formación terciaria: Normativa y pautas institucionales relacionadas. https://www.cse.udelar.edu.uy/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/documento_ordenanza_de_grado_corregida_paginas_simples.pdf
Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. (2018). Resolución N.° 048. Plan de estudios de la Tecnicatura Universitaria en Deporte. RES CSDEyVE Nº 048-18 - Ad-Ref Resol. Rectoral 1048-18 Modificacion alancance Titulo Tecn. en Deportes
Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro (2020, diciembre 14). Resolución CSDEYVE N.° 046, Sistema de Créditos para Carreras de Grado y Posgrado de la Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. http://rid.unrn.edu.ar/handle/20.500.12049/6637
Upegui, M. (2008). La flexibilidad curricular y el contexto socioeconómico. Grupo interdisciplinario de investigación en currículo. Universidad de Antioquía.
Wade, W. (1994) Introduction. En W. Wade, K. Hodgkinson, A. Smith, & J. Arfield (Eds.), Flexible learning in higher education (pp.12-16). Kogan.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Soledad Vercelino, Mahira González Bruzzese
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
