Beliefs Versus Knowledge in Trainee Teachers. A Compared Study of Neuromyths at an International Level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.25-1.13Keywords:
Myths in education, neurosciences, teacher training, teachers, readingAbstract
Neuromyths are mistaken beliefs about the brain and its functioning and are based on pseudoscientific arguments or misinterpretations of certain findings. These erroneous ideas may stem from erroneous or poorly explained information from mass communication, ignorance of technical language in neuroscience, or limited access to primary sources. In assessing the level of neuromyths awareness in a Spanish-speaking sample of future teachers, and in seeking to replicate previous research on in-service teachers, this study applied a Spanish-translated version of the questionnaire created by Dekker et al. (2012). An instrument of 32 statements on the brain and learning, 12 of which were neuromyths, was applied to a sample of 99 early childhood education students from Chile and Spain. The results showed high neuromyth adhesion in both groups. Despite increasing evidence refuting some of these erroneous conceptions, these results conclusively showed a persisting neuroscientific knowledge gap in future educators. The consequences of such incomprehension or distortions of valid scientific knowledge in educational praxis impel us to insist on evidence-based education. Indeed, beyond simple reading, the careful selection and inclusion of scientific sources in the initial teacher training are essential for training teachers to read critically and reflectively; they will be able to make educational decisions based on available scientific evidence.
References
Allen, K.-N. y van der Zwan, R. (2019). The myth of left- vs right-brain learning. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(1), 189-200. https://www.ijicc.net/index.php/volume-5-2019/51-vol-5-iss-1
Betts, K., Miller, M., Tokuhama-Espinosa, T., Shewokis, P. A., Anderson, A., Borja, C., Galoyan, T., Delaney B., Eigenauer, J. D.y Dekker, S. (2019). International report: Neuromyths and evidence-based practices in higher education. OLC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED599002
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M. y Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 240-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.00 1
Bromfield, D., Davis, A. y Selwyn, Z. (Creadores). (2018). Creativity, Episodio de serie de televisión]. En M. Valdes y P. Williams (Productor ejecutivo). Brainchild. Estados Unidos, Netflix.
Busso, D. S. y Pollack, C. (2015). No brain left behind: Consequences of neuroscience discourse for education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(2), 168-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.908908
Cain, T. (2017). Denial, opposition, rejection or dissent: Why do teachers contest research evidence. Research Papers in Education, 32(5), 611-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1225807
Cameron, C. E., Cottone, E. A., Murrah, W. M. y Grissmer, D. W. (2016). How are motor skills linked to children’s school performance and academic achievement? Child Development Perspectives, 10(2), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12168
Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000228834
Cousins, J. B. y Leithwood, K. A. (1993). Enhancing knowledge utilization as a strategy for school improvement. Science Communication, 14(3), 305-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554709301400303
Dagenais, C., Lysenko, L., Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Ramde, J. y Janosz, M. (2012). Use of research-based information by school practitioners and determinants of use: a review of empirical research. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 8(3), 285-309. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426412X654031
Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.00106
de Bruyckere, P., Kirschner, P. A. y Hulshof, C. D. (2015). Urban myths about learning and education. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801537-7.00003-2
Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P. y Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in psychology, 3(429), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429
Deligiannidi, K. y Howard-Jones, P. A. (2015). The neuroscience literacy of teachers in Greece. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3909-3915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1133
Devine, D., Fahie, D. y McGillicuddy, D. (2013). What is ‘good’ teaching? Teacher beliefs and practices about their teaching. Irish Educational Studies, 32(1), 83-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2013.773228
Díaz Larenas, C. H., Solar Rodríguez, M. I., Soto Hernández, V., Conejeros Solar, M. y Vergara Morales, J. (2015). Temas clave en la formación de profesores en Chile desde la perspectiva de docentes y directivos. Revista Complutense de Educación, 26(3), 543-569. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2015.v26.n3.44300
Ferjan Ramirez, N. y Kuhl, P. (2017). Bilingual baby: Foreign language intervention in Madrid’s infant education centers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 11(3), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12144
Fives, H. y Gill, M. G. (Eds.). (2015). International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108437
Gleichgerrcht, E., Lira Luttges, B., Salvarezza, F. y Campos, A. L. (2015). Educational neuromyths among teachers in Latin America. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(3), 170-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12086
Greenough, W. y Volkmar, F. (1973). Pattern of dendritic branching in occipital cortex of rats reared in complex environments. Experimental Neurology, 40(2), 491-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4886(73)90090-3
Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: Myth and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817
Jarrett, C. (2014). Great myths of the brain. John Wiley & Sons.
Karakus, O., Howard-Jones, P. A. y Jay, T. (2015). Primary and secondary school teachers’ knowledge and misconceptions about the brain in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1933-1940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.858
Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Stop propagating the learning styles myth. Computers & Education, 106, 166-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.006
Konrad, M., Criss, C. J. y Telesman, A. O. (2019). Fads or facts? Sifting through the evidence to find what really works. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(5), 272-279. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1053451218819234
Kroeze, K., Hyatt, K. y Lambert, C. (2015). Brain gym: Let the user beware. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 26(4), 395-401.
Kucian, K., Grond, U., Rotzer, S., Henzi, B., Schönmann, C., Plangger, F., Gälli, M., Martin, E. y von Aster, M. (2011). Mental number line training in children with developmental dyscalculia. Neuroimage, 57(3), 782-795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.070
Kuhl, P. K. y Ferjan Ramirez, N. (2019). Neuroscience and education: How early brain development affects school. En P. K. Kuhl, S.-S. Lim, S. Guerriero y D. van Damme (Eds.), Developing minds in the digital age. towards a science of learning for 21st century education (25-36). Paris: Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing.
Latham, G. (1993). Do educators use the literature of the profession? NASSP Bulletin 77(550), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659307755009
Masento, N. A., Golightly, M., Field, D. T., Butler, L. T. y van Reekum, C. M. (2014). Effects of hydration status on cognitive performance and mood. British Journal of Nutrition, 111(10) 1841-1852. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114513004455
Ministerio de Educación. (2007). Serie 1 para docentes de Secundaria. Nuevos paradigmas educativos Fascículo 7: Los estilos de aprendizaje. Autor. http://www2.minedu.gob.pe/minedu/03-bibliografia-para-ebr/60-fasciculo-7-estilos-de-aprendizaje.pdf
Ministerio de Educación de Chile. (2001). Bases curriculares de la educación parvularia. Autor.
Ministerio de Educación de Chile. (2015). Diversificación de la enseñanza. Decreto No. 83/2015. Apreuba criterios y orientaciones de adecuación curricular para estudiantes con necesidades educativas especiales de educación parvularia y educación básica. División de Educación General, Unidad de Currículum. http://especial.mineduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2016/08/Decreto-83-2015.pdf
Ministerio de Educación de Chile. (2018). Bases Curriculares. Educación Parvularia. Autor.
Muñoz, C., Lobos, C. y Valenzuela, J. (2020). Disociaciones entre discurso y prácticas lectoras en futuros profesores: Pistas para la formación docente. Revista Fuentes, 22(2), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2020.v22.i2.07
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
