Suitability criteria used by future primary school teachers in the assessment of math educational videos




teacher training, reflective competence, didactic suitability criteria, educational video, percentages


This research describes the criteria implicitly used by a group of future primary school teachers when assessing the adequacy of the planned didactical trajectory after watching two videos in an educational channel to teach sixth graders a specific content, percentages. The content analysis methodology is used to examine the written reports prepared by 61 third-year students enrolled in the class Design and Development of Primary Education Mathematics Curriculum during the 2019-2020 school year, as part of the Primary Teacher Education program at the University of Granada, Spain. Their reports were assessed based on the authors’ a priori consensus analysis of the didactic suitability of educational videos. Results show that student teachers implicitly use epistemic and interactive criteria to a great extent, as well as cognitive, affective, and ecological criteria. Although in general their assessments are quite inaccurate, student teachers recognize the need for teachers to analyze the relevance of these resources before recommending them to their students, which have acquired a fundamental role in education with the virtual teaching format due to the arrival of COVID-19. The paper highlights the importance of giving educators the opportunity to reflect on the practice by incorporating tools that allow them to direct their attention to relevant aspects in the teaching and learning process.


Beltrán-Pellicer, P., Giacomone, B., & Burgos, M. (2018). Online educational videos according to specific didactics: the case of mathematics. Cultura y Educación, 30(4), 633-662.

Beltrán-Pellicer, P., Godino, J. D., & Giacomone, B. (2018). Elaboración de indicadores específicos de idoneidad didáctica en probabilidad: Aplicación para la reflexión sobre la práctica docente. Bolema, 32(61), 526-548.

Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM, 48(5), 589-610.

Breda, A. (2020). Características del análisis didáctico realizado por profesores para justificar la mejora en la enseñanza de las matemáticas. Bolema, 34(66), 69-88.

Breda, A., Font, V., & Pino-Fan, L. (2018). Criterios valorativos y normativos en la didáctica de las matemáticas: El caso del constructo idoneidad didáctica. Bolema, 32(60), 255-278.

Breda, A., Pino-Fan, L., & Font, V. (2017). Meta didactic-mathematical knowledge of teachers: criteria for the reflections and assessment on teaching practice. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(6), 1893-1918.

Burgos, M., Beltrán-Pellicer, P., & Godino, J. D. (2020). La cuestión de la idoneidad de los vídeos educativos de matemáticas: Una experiencia de análisis con futuros maestros de educación primaria | The issue of didactical suitability in mathematics educational videos: experience of analysis with prospective primary school teachers. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 78(275), 27-49.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. Routledge.

Dabbagh, B., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 3-8.

Dole, S. (2010). Promoting Percent as a Proportion in Eighth-Grade Mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 10(7), 345-396.

Duffy, P. (2008). Engaging the YouTube Google-eyed generation: Strategies for using Web 2.0 in teaching and learning. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 6(2), 119-130.

Esqué de los Ojos, D., & Breda, A. (2021). Valoración y rediseño de una unidad sobre proporcionalidad, utilizando la herramienta idoneidad didáctica. Uniciencia, 35(1), 38-54.

Gellert, U., Becerra, R., & Chapman, O. (2013). Research methods in mathematics teacher education. En K. M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 327-360). Springer-Verlag.

Godino, J. D. (2013). Indicadores de idoneidad didáctica de procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje de las matemáticas. Cuadernos de Investigación y Formación en Educación Matemática, 11, 111-132.

Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(1-2), 127-135.

Godino, J. D., Bencomo, D., Font, V., & Wilhelmi, M. R. (2006). Análisis y valoración de la idoneidad didáctica de procesos de estudio de las matemáticas. Paradigma, 27(2), 221-252.

Godino, J. D., Giacomone, B., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2017). Enfoque ontosemiótico de los conocimientos y competencias del profesor de matemáticas. Bolema, 31(57), 90-113.

He, W., Holton, A., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. (2016). The effects of flipped instruction on out-of-class study time, exam performance, and student perceptions. Learning and Instruction, 45, 61–71.

Hummes, V. B., Font, V. & Breda, A. (2019). Uso combinado del estudio de clases y la idoneidad didáctica para el desarrollo de la reflexión sobre la propia práctica en la formación de profesores de matemáticas. Acta Scientiae, 21(1), 64-82.

Lafuente-Lechuga, M. & Faura-Martínez, U. (2019). Evaluation of videos of mathematical concepts made by students. Cultura y Educación, 31(4), 845-864.

Nilssen, V. (2010). Encouraging the Habit of Seeing in Student Teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 591-598.

Parker, M & Leinhardt, G. (1995). Percent: a privileged proportion. Review of Educational Research, 65(4), 421-481.

Portugal, K. O., Arruda, S. D. M., & Passos, M. M. (2018). Free-choice teaching: how YouTube presents a new kind of teacher. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 17(1), 183–199.

Posadas, P., & Godino, J. D. (2017). Reflexión sobre la práctica docente como estrategia formativa para desarrollar el conocimiento didáctico-matemático. Didacticae, 1, 77-96.

Pozo-Sánchez, S., López-Belmonte, J., Rodríguez-García, A. M., & López-Núñez J. A. (2020). Competencia digital docente para el uso y gestión analítica informacional del aprendizaje invertido. Cultura y Educación, 32(2), 226-241.

Ramos-Rodríguez, E., Flores, P., & Ponte, J. P. (2017). An approach to the notion of reflective teacher and its exemplification on mathematics education. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30(1), 85-102.

Seckel, M. J. & Font, V. (2020). Competencia reflexiva en formadores del profesorado de matemática. Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 12(25), 127-144.

Sun, J. & van Es, E. A. (2015). An Exploratory Study of the Influence that Analyzing Teaching Has on Preservice Teachers' Classroom Practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 201-214.

Turney, C. S. M., Robinson, D., Lee, M., & Soutar, A. (2009). Using technology to direct learning in higher education. The way forward? Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 71-83.

Zainuddin, Z., Habiburrahim, H., Muluk, S., & Keumala, C. M. (2019). How do students become self-directed learners in the EFL flipped-class pedagogy? A study in higher education. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 678.



How to Cite

Suitability criteria used by future primary school teachers in the assessment of math educational videos. (2021). Uniciencia, 35(2), 1-17.



Original scientific papers (evaluated by academic peers)

How to Cite

Suitability criteria used by future primary school teachers in the assessment of math educational videos. (2021). Uniciencia, 35(2), 1-17.

Comentarios (ver términos de uso)

Most read articles by the same author(s)