Proportional Reasoning in Solving Sample Space Quantification and Probability Comparison Tasks by Primary School Students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.39-1.28

Keywords:

Proportional reasoning, probabilistic reasoning, urns, ontosemiotic approach, primary education

Abstract

Proportional reasoning is considered a key element in probabilistic reasoning. Various studies have suggested that insufficient proportional reasoning may be the cause of many errors made by students when dealing with probability problems. [Objective] The aim of this study is to identify the proportional reasoning used by sixth grade students (11-12 years old) when solving sample space quantification and probability comparison tasks. [Methodology] Through an exploratory qualitative approach, the responses of 47 Spanish students from a public school were analyzed in relation to two problems: one focused on comparing probabilities (ratio comparison), and the other on determining the composition of a box to generate equal probabilities (proportional distribution). The analysis of the solutions using semiotic functions allows identification of relationships between objects involved in the tasks and the characteristic elements of proportional reasoning, facilitating interpretation of students’ errors. [Results] The results show that the students struggled to select the box with the highest probability of success, which indicates insufficient proportional reasoning. However, most students were able to correctly determine the composition of a box needed to maintain a given probability, whereas few could justify their reasoning based on probability or proportionality. [Conclusions] The results contrast with previous research findings and show previously unidentified difficulties in solving proportional distribution problems in a probabilistic or arithmetic context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2014). Foundation to year 10 curriculum: Statistics and Probability (ACMSPO24).

Batanero, C. y Borovcnik, M. (2016). Statistics and probability in high school. Springer.

Batanero, C. y Díaz, C. (2007). The Meaning and Understanding of Mathematics. En K. François y J. Van Bendegem (Eds.), Philosophical Dimensions in Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Library (pp. 107-128). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71575-9_6

Batanero, C., Álvarez-Arroyo, R., Hernández-Solís, L. A. y Gea, M. M. (2021). El inicio del razonamiento probabilístico en educación infantil. PNA: Revista de investigación en didáctica de la matemática, 15(4), 267-288. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v15i4.22349

Batanero, C., Chernoff, E. J., Engel, J., Lee, H. S. y Sánchez, E. (2016). Research on teaching and learning probability. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31625-3

Batanero, C., Hernández-Solís, L. A. y Gea, M. M. (2023). Analysing Costa Rican and Spanish students´ comparisons of probabilities and ratios. SERJ, 22(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v22i3.659

Begolli, K. N., Dai, T., McGinn, K. M. y Booth, J. L. (2021). Could probability be out of proportion? Self-explanation and example-based practice help students with lower proportional reasoning skills learn probability. Instructional Science, 49, 441–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09550-9

Ben-Chaim, D., Keret, Y. y Ilany, B. (2012). Ratio and proportion: Research and teaching in mathematics teachers’ education. Sense Publisher.

Borovcnik, M. y Kapadia, R. (2014). A Historical and Philosophical Perspective on Probability. En E. Chernoff y B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic Thinking. Advances in Mathematics Education (pp. 7-34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_2

Bryant, P. y Nunes, T. (2012). Children’s understanding of probability: A literature review (full report). The Nuffield Foundation.

Cañizares, M. J. (1997). Influencia del razonamiento proporcional y combinatorio y de creencias subjetivas en las intuiciones probabilísticas primarias. [Tesis doctoral]. Universidad de Granada.

Castillo, S. y Fernández, C. (2022). Secondary School Students’ Performances on Ratio Comparison Problems. Acta Scientiae, 24(6), 60-88. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6834

Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI) (2015). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org/Math/

Fernández, C., Ivars, P., Rojas, F. y Castillo, S. (2024). Desde estrategias aditivas hasta estrategias proporcionales: características identificadas con estudiantes de Educación Básica Media y Superior de Ecuador, Educación Matemática, 36(2), 68-91. https://doi.org/10.24844/EM3602.03

Godino, J. D. (2024). Enfoque ontosemiótico en educación matemática. Fundamentos, herramientas y aplicaciones. McGraw-Hill - Aula Magna. Versión digital de acceso abierto: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/93596

Godino, J. D., Burgos, M. y Gea, M. M. (2021). Analysing theories of meaning in mathematics education from the onto-semiotic approach. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(10), 2609–2636. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1896042.

Gopnik, A. (2012). Scientific thinking in young children: Theoretical advances, empirical research, and policy implications. Science, 337(6102), 1623-1627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223416

Hernández-Solís, L. A., Batanero, C. y Gea, M. M. (2024). Relación entre la construcción de espacios muestrales y el razonamiento proporcional de estudiantes costarricenses. Revista de Educación Estadística, 3, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.29035/redes.3.1.1

Hernández-Solís, L. A., Batanero, C., Gea, M. M. y Álvarez-Arroyo, R. (2021a). Comparing probabilities in urns: A study with primary school students. (2021). Uniciencia, 35(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.35-2.9

Hernández-Solís, L. A., Batanero, C., Gea, M. M. y Álvarez-Arroyo, R. (2021b). Construction of sample spaces associated with different types of events: an exploratory study with Primary Education students. Educación Matemática, 33(1), 181-207. https://doi.org/10.24844/em3301.07

Hernández-Solís, L. A., Batanero, C., Gea, M. M. y Álvarez-Arroyo, R. (2021c). Resolución de tareas probabilísticas en contexto geométrico por estudiantes de Educación Primaria. Educação & Realidade, 46(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-6236105401

Hernández-Solís, L. A., Batanero, C., Gea, M. M. y Álvarez-Arroyo, R. (2023). Research on children’s reasoning in comparing probabilities. BEIO, Boletín de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, 39(1), 1-24

Horvath, J. K. y Lehrer, R. (1998). A Model-Based Perspective on the Development of Children’s Understanding of Chance and Uncertainty. En S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Reflections on Statistics: Learning, Teaching, and Assessment in Grades K-12 (pp. 121-148). Routledge.

Lamon, S. (2007). Rational number and proportional reasoning: toward a theoretical framework for research. En F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629-667). NCTM.

Langrall, C. W. y Mooney, E. S. (2005). Characteristics of elementary school students’ probabilistic reasoning. En G. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school (pp. 95–119). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24530-8_5

McMillan, J. H. y Schumacher, S. (2005). Investigación educativa: una introducción conceptual. (5. ª ed.) Pearson Educación.

Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional (MEFP) (2022). Real Decreto 157/2022, de 1 de marzo, por el que se establecen la ordenación y las enseñanzas mínimas de la Educación Primaria. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 52(I), 24386-24504.

Pratt, D. y Kazak, S. (2018). Research on Uncertainty. En D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar y J. Garfield (Eds.), International Handbook of Research in Statistics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education (pp. 193-227). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_6

Sánchez Ordoñez, E. A. (2014). Hacer un reparto proporcional o un reparto equitativo: ¿cómo influye el contexto para tomar la decisión? Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, 7(2), 44–60.

Supply, A. S., Vanluydt, E., Van Dooren, W. y Onghena, P. (2023). Out of proportion or out of context? Comparing 8- to 9-year-olds’ proportional reasoning abilities across fair-sharing, mixtures, and probability contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113, 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10212-5

Supply, A.S., Van Dooren, W. y Onghena, P. (2020). Can we count on early numerical abilities for early probabilistic reasoning abilities? Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 24(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1805551

Truran, J. (1994). Examination of a relationship between children’s estimation of probabilities and their understanding of proportion. En J. P. Ponte y J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 4, pp. 337–344). PME

Van Dooren, W. (2014). Probabilistic thinking: analyses from a psychological perspective. En E. Chernoff y B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic Thinking. Advances in Mathematics Education (pp. 123-126). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_7

Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Depaepe, F., Janssens, D. y Verschaffel, L. (2003). The Illusion of Linearity: Expanding the evidence towards probabilistic reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53, 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025516816886

Yeong, J. I., Martínez, R. y Dougherty, B. (2020). Misconceptions on part-part-whole proportional relationships using proportional division problems. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 12(2), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1548222

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

Issue

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2025): Uniciencia. January-December, 2025

Section

Original scientific papers (evaluated by academic peers)

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Shared by Journal and Authors (CC-BY-NC-ND)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. Authors guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

2. Authors can set separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. The authors have declared to hold all permissions to use the resources they provided in the paper (images, tables, among others) and assume full responsibility for damages to third parties.

4. The opinions expressed in the paper are the exclusive responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the editors or the Universidad Nacional.


Uniciencia Journal and all its productions are under  Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Unported.

There is neither fee for access nor Article Processing Charge (APC)

How to Cite

Burgos, M., Tizón-Escamilla , N. ., & López-Martín, M. del M. (2025). Proportional Reasoning in Solving Sample Space Quantification and Probability Comparison Tasks by Primary School Students. Uniciencia, 39(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.39-1.28

Funding data