Statistical Evaluation of the Levels of Mercury Detected in Billfish in Costa Rica, for 2003-2013

Authors

  • Javier Rodríguez-Yáñez Laboratorio de Ecología Urbana, Universidad Estatal a Distancia (UNED), Costa Rica
  • Gilberto Piedra-Marín Escuela de Química, Universidad Nacional (UNA), Costa Rica

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.30-2.2

Keywords:

Mercury, analysis, statistics, billffish, Costa Rica, LANASEVE.

Abstract

The billfish, like marlin, fish sailing and swordfish are pelagic predators, top in the food chain; large specimens contain significant levels of methyl mercury (MeHg+) in their tissues. In the current work, all mercury analysis records in billfish were reviewed, classified, tabulated, and statistically analyzed, for the period 2003-2013 by Laboratorio Nacional de Servicios Veterinarios or LANASEVE (National Laboratory of Veterinary Services). The mercury levels had a Poisson type distribution behavior; the majority of the analysis were associated with samples fluctuating in the range of fish 0.2 mg Hg/kg to 0.4 mg Hg/kg. Compared to swordfish, there was a greater dispersion in marlin mercury levels. Average mercury concentration in marlin was 0,583 mg Hg / kg, while in swordfish it was 0,533 mg Hg / kg. The Valores de Ingesta Semanal Tolerable Recomendada o ISTR (Tolerable Weekly Intake Values Recommended) for marlin consumption were 165 g/week for pregnant women and 96 g/week for children, meanwhile for swordfish were 180 g/week and 105 g/week, respectively. Slightly higher mercury levels in marlin suggest a lower weekly consumption compared to swordfish. 

References

Agencia Catalana de Seguridad Alimentaria. Metilmercurio. (2011). ACSA Brief Salud y Seguridad Alimentaria, Departament de Salut 2011. Recuperado de http://www.gencat.cat/salut/acsa/html/es/.../acsabrief08-2011metilmercurio.pdf

Asamblea Legislativa de la República de Costa Rica. (2005). Ley 8436. Ley de Pesca y Acuicultura. Publicado en La Gaceta, número 78, del 25 de abril del 2005.

Bloom, N. S. (1992). On the methylmercury content of fish tissue. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 49, 92­113.

Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas. (2007). Reglamento (CE) No 333/2007 de la Comisión de 28 de marzo de 2007 por el que se establecen los métodos de inorgánico, 3-MCPD y benzo(a)pireno en los productos alimenticios. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea 2007, 88/29-88/38. Recuperado de http://www.boe.es/doue/2007/088/L00029-00038.pdf.

Departamento de Pesca de la FAO. (1994). Examen de la situación mundial de las especies altamente migratorias y las poblaciones transzonales. FAO Documento Técnico de Pesca. No. 337. Roma, FAO. 75p. ISBN 92-5-303523-4. Recuperado de: http:/ http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/t3740s/t3740s00.htm

EFSA. (2012). Scientific Opinion on the risk for the public health related to the presence of mercury and methyl mercury in food. EFSA Journal, 10(12), 2985.

ELIKA. (2005). Mercurio en pescado. Araba, España: Fundacion Vasca para la Seguridad Agroalimentaria.

Farré. R., Cameán. A. M., Vidal, M. C., Santacruz, A. L., Teruel, V. J. y Canales, E. T. (2010). Informe del Comité Científico de la Agencia Española de Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutrición (AESAN) en relación a los niveles de mercurio establecidos para los productos de la pesca. Revista del Comité Científico, 12, 29-36. Recuperado de http://aesan.msssi.gob.es/AESAN/docs/docs/evaluacion_riesgos/comite_cientifico/MERCURIO_P.PESCA.pdf

FDA. (2014). Mercury Levels in Commercial Fish and Shellfish (1990-2010). Silver Spring, U.S.A.: U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Recuperado de: http://www.fda.gov/food/foodborneillnesscontaminants/metals/ucm115644.htm

House of Representatives. (2012). Billfish Conservation Act of 2012. Recuperado de www.congress.gov/112/crpt/hrpt656/CRPT-112hrpt656.pdf

INCOPESCA (2008). Comunicación de acuerdo 476-2008. Recuperado de http://www.fecop.org/wp-content/.../ACUERDO-476-2008-PEZ-VELA-1.pdf

Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. (2003). Contaminants: Methylmercury. En WHO Technical Report Series, 922 (Ed.). Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants: Sixty-first report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2003; 132-141. Rome, Italy. Recuperado de http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_922.pdf

LANASEVE. (2012). Formulario SEG-PE-001-RE-002 Recepción de muestras para alimentos (xls). Recuperado de: http://www.senasa.go.cr/senasa/sitio/index.php/archivos/view/1098.

Mar Viva, INCOPESCA, MEIC. (2012). Guía de identificación de filetes de pescado y mariscos. Recuperado de http://marviva.net/images/Consumo_Responsable/guia_de_identificacion_de_filetes_de_pescado_y_mariscos.pdf

SENASA. (2012). Toma y manejo de muestras oficiales en productos pesqueros. Dirección de Inocuidad de Productos de Origen Animal. Recuperado de: http://www.senasa.go.cr/senasa/sitio/files/120912023910.pdf

The Billfish Foundation. (2015). What are billfish? Recuperado de http://www.billfish.org/education/what-are-billfish/

Published

2016-07-01

How to Cite

Statistical Evaluation of the Levels of Mercury Detected in Billfish in Costa Rica, for 2003-2013. (2016). Uniciencia, 30(2), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.30-2.2

Issue

Section

Original scientific papers (evaluated by academic peers)

How to Cite

Statistical Evaluation of the Levels of Mercury Detected in Billfish in Costa Rica, for 2003-2013. (2016). Uniciencia, 30(2), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.30-2.2

Comentarios (ver términos de uso)

Most read articles by the same author(s)