Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability and Self-Efficacy: A Mixed-Methods Study involving Indonesian Students




mathematical, creative thinking ability, self-efficacy, cognitive novelty, cognitive variety, cognitive framing


With regard to creativity in mathematics, scholars tend to focus on the logical realm, which includes fluency, flexibility, and originality while overlooking the value of the affective domain, which includes self-efficacy, beliefs, and attitudes. The objectives of this study were 1) to investigate the extent to which self-efficacy affects students’ mathematical creative thinking ability; and 2) to determine the characteristics of students with high mathematical creative thinking ability and high self-efficacy. A mixed-method approach, that combined semi-structured interviews, and correlation analysis was employed to investigate the effect of self-efficacy on students’ mathematical creative thinking ability. The participants of the study were selected from junior high schools (JHS) in the city of Makassar. Ninety-six students (42 boys and 54 girls, aged 14 years old) completed a questionnaire assessing their mathematics self-efficacy. In general, the results proved that self-efficacy had an effect on JHS students’ mathematical creative thinking ability. This study also revealed that students with high self-efficacy are more likely to possess high mathematical creative thinking ability and vice versa. The characteristics of students with high mathematical creative thinking ability and high self-efficacy include excessive anxiety, reliance on key experiences, such as the ability to generate ideas (cognitive novelty), the ability to propose various solutions (cognitive variety), and the ability to change perceptions (cognitive framing).


Bandura, A. (2010). Self-efficacy -Bandura. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, 1–3.

Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447–457.

Bicer, A., Lee, Y., Perihan, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2020). Considering mathematical creative self-efficacy with problem posing as a measure of mathematical creativity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 457–485.

Byrge, C., & Tang, C. (2015). Embodied creativity training: Effects on creative self-efficacy and creative production. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 51–61.

Campbell, C. (December, 2008). Book review: Foucault, psychology and the analytics of power by Hook, Derek. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007, 16, 1–16.

Chan, J. C. Y., & Lam, S. F. (2008). Effects of competition on students’ self-efficacy in vicarious learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 95–108.

Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and Contextual Predictors of Creative Performance : Creativity Research Journal, 16(2 & 3), 187–199.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. In Educational Research, 4.

Farmer, S. M. (2017). Creative self-efficacy : potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance CREATIVE SELF-EFFICACY : ITS POTENTIAL ANTECEDENTS AND, 45(January 2002), 1137–1148.

Fraenkel, Jack R; Wallen, Norman E; Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to Design Research in Education and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed) (S. Kiefer (ed.); 8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Gao, J. (2020). Sources of Mathematics Self-Efficacy in Chinese Students: a Mixed-Method Study with Q-Sorting Procedure. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(4), 713–732.

Goldin, G. A. (2017). Mathematical creativity and giftedness: perspectives in response. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(1), 147–157.

Güss, C. D. & Dörner, D. (2017). The importance of motivation and emotion for explaining human cognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 38–39.

Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127–143.

Huang, M. C. L., Chou, C. Y., Wu, Y. T., Shih, J. L., Yeh, C. Y. C., Lao, A. C. C., Fong, H., Lin, Y. F., & Chan, T. W. (2020). Interest-driven video creation for learning mathematics. In Journal of Computers in Education 7(3). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Hulsizer, H. (2016). Student-produced videos for exam review in mathematics courses. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 271–278.

Ikram, Muhammad, Purwanto, Nengah Parta, I., & Susanto, H. (2020a). Mathematical reasoning required when students seek the original graph from a derivative graph. Acta Scientiae, 22(6), 45–64.

Ikram, Muhammad, Purwanto, Parta, I. N., & Susanto, H. (2020b). Exploring the potential role of reversible reasoning: Cognitive research on inverse function problems in mathematics. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 591–611.

Jaafar, W. M. W. & Ayu, A. F. M. (2010). Mathematics self-efficacy and meta-cognition among university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8(December 2013), 519–524.

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12.

Kearney, M., & Schuck, S. (2005). Students in the Director’s Seat: Teaching and Learning with Student-generated Video. Edmedia, 2864–2871.

Lai, Y., Zhu, X., Chen, Y., & Li, Y. (2015). Effects of mathematics anxiety and mathematical metacognition on word problem solving in children with and without mathematical learning difficulties. PLoS ONE, 10(6).

Laws, J. (2002). Self-efficacy beliefs and creative performance in adults: A phenomenological investigation. In National Library of Canada (pp. 1–192).

Leikin, R. (2014). Challenging Mathematics with Multiple Solution Tasks and Mathematical Investigations in Geometry. 59–80.

Leikin, R., & Elgrably, H. (2020). Problem posing through investigations for the development and evaluation of proof-related skills and creativity skills of prospective high school mathematics teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 102(July 2018), 1–13.

Levenson, E. (2013). Tasks that may occasion mathematical creativity: Teachers’ choices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(4), 269–291.

Liu, C. J., Jack, B. M., & Chiu, H. L. (2008). Taiwan elementary teachers’ views of science teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 19–35.

Menon, D., & Sadler, T. D. (2018). Sources of Science Teaching Self-Efficacy for Preservice Elementary Teachers in Science Content Courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(5), 835–855.

Moores, T. T., Cha-Jan, J. C., & Smith, D. K. (2006). Clarifying the Role of Self-Efficacy and Metacognition as Predictors of Performance: Construct Development and Test. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 37, 125–132.

Moscovici, S., & Marková, I. (2006). The Making of Modern Social Psychology: The Hidden Story of How an International Social Science was Created, 1, 1–296.

Özcan, Z. Ç. & Eren Gümüş, A. (2019). A modeling study to explain mathematical problem-solving performance through metacognition, self-efficacy, motivation, and anxiety. Australian Journal of Education, 63(1), 116–134.

Özsoy, G. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between metacognition and mathematics achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(2), 227–235.

Philipp, R. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 257–315.

Rahayuningsih, S, Hasbi, M., Mulyati, M., & Nurhusain, M. (2021). The Effect of Self-Regulated Learning on Students’ Problem-Solving Abilities. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 927–939.

Rahayuningsih, S, Sirajuddin, S., & Ikram, M. (2021). Using Open-ended Problem-solving Tests to Identify Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 285–299.

Rahayuningsih, Sri, Sirajuddin, S., & Nasrun, N. (2020). Cognitive flexibility: exploring students’ problem-solving in elementary school mathematics learning. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 6(1), 59–70.

Runco, M. A. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1996(72), 3–30.

Sewell, W. H. (1989). Some Reflections on the Golden Age of Interdisciplinary Social Psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(2), 88.

Sharma, S., & Gigras, Y. (2017). A Survey. 1953, 87–97.

Singer, F. M., Voica, C., & Pelczer, I. (2017). Cognitive styles in posing geometry problems: implications for assessment of mathematical creativity. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(1), 37–52.

Vasile, C., Marhan, A. M., Singer, F. M., & Stoicescu, D. (2011). Academic self-efficacy and cognitive load in students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12(February 2014), 478–482.

Voica, C., Singer, F. M., & Stan, E. (2020). How are motivation and self-efficacy interacting in problem-solving and problem-posing? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 487–517.

Zarch, M. K., & Kadivar, P. (2006). The role of mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics ability in the structural model of mathematics performance. WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics, 5(6), 713–720.



How to Cite

Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability and Self-Efficacy: A Mixed-Methods Study involving Indonesian Students. (2022). Uniciencia, 36(1), 1-14.



Original scientific papers (evaluated by academic peers)

How to Cite

Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability and Self-Efficacy: A Mixed-Methods Study involving Indonesian Students. (2022). Uniciencia, 36(1), 1-14.

Comentarios (ver términos de uso)

Most read articles by the same author(s)