Evaluation of an Environmental Education Strategy on the Knowledge of Native Fauna Within the Framework of Folk Taxonomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.25-1.2Keywords:
Environmental education, Biodiversity, Native faunaAbstract
Since folk taxonomy is related to the innate classification of organisms, it could be the basis for designing, implementing, and evaluating environmental education strategies focused on biodiversity and its conservation. Through folk taxonomy, this study assessed a game-based environmental education intervention designed to improve Colombian native species’ knowledge. Two hundred and ninety-one (291) students from 4th to 9th grade of 11 public schools in Cundinamarca, Colombia, played ad libitum during the school recess period without a tutor. Students were asked to list all native Colombian animals they knew before playing for the first time and after having played for four to five weeks. The native animals mentioned were classified into the following ethnobiological taxonomic categories: life forms, generic, and specific. Although the composition of the “life forms” category did not change, there was a decrease in its abundance (taxa: two pre-game vs. two post-game; mentions: 101 pre-game vs. 89 post-game). Besides, there was an increase in composition and abundance in the “generic” category (taxa: 82 pre-game vs. 104 post-game; total 115; mentions: 2293 pre-game vs. 2505 post-game) and in the “specific” category (taxa: 24 pre-game vs. 53 post-game; total 64; mentions: 400 pre-game vs. 706 post-game). Because of the relation the relation between culture and the ethnobiological taxonomic categories, the decrease of abundance of taxa in the “life forms” category, and the increase of composition and abundance of taxa in the “generic” and “specific” categories, the results of this study can be considered as ideal for education interventions based on biodiversity and species identification.
References
Anderson, J. L. (2001). Stone-Age minds at work on 21st century science: How cognitive psychology can inform conservation biology. Conservation in Practice, 2(3), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4629.2001.tb00013.x
Balmford, A., Clegg, L., Coulson, T. y Taylor, J. (2002). Why conservationists should heed Pokémon. Science, 295(5564), 2367. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.295.5564.2367b
Beaudreau, A. H., Levin, P. S. y Norman, K. C. (2011). Using folk taxonomies to understand stakeholder perceptions for species conservation. Conservation Letters, 4(6), 451-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00199.x
Belke, B., Leder, H., Harsanyi, G. y Carbon, C. C. (2010). When a Picasso is a “Picasso”: The entry point in the identification of visual art. Acta Psychologica, 133(2), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.007
Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E. y Raven, P. H. (1973). General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist, 75(1), 214-242. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00140
Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E., Mazzuto, G. y Paciarotti, C. (2015). “Cook & Teach”: Learning by playing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 259-271. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.085
Brown, C. H. (1979). Folk zoological life-forms: Their universality and growth. American Anthropologist, 81(4), 791-817. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1979.81.4.02a00030
Brown, C. H. (1982). Folk zoological life-forms and liguistic marking. Journal of Ethnobiology, 2(1), 95-112. https://ethnobiology.org/journal/%5Bfield_volume-raw%5D-57
Cabral de Oliveira, J. (2008). Classificações em cena. Algumas formas de classificações das plantas cultivadas pelos Wajãpi do Amapari (AP). En M. Lenaerts y A. M. Spadafora (Eds.), Pueblos indígenas, plantas y mercados. Amazonía y Gran Chaco (pp. 29-58). Zeta Books. https://www.academia.edu/31697104/Pueblos_ind%C3%ADgenas_plantas_y_mercado_Amazonia_e_Gran_Chaco
Campos, C. M., Nates, J. y Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2013). Percepción y conocimiento de la biodiversidad por estudiantes urbanos y rurales de las tierras áridas del centro-oeste de Argentina. Ecologia Austral, 23(3), 174-183. www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/ecoaus/v23n3/v23n3a06.pdf
Ferreira, E. N., da S Mourão, J., Rocha, P. D., Nascimento, D. M. y da S Q Bezerra, D. M. M. (2009). Folk classification of the crabs and swimming crabs (Crustacea – Brachyura) of the Mamanguape river estuary, Northeastern – Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 5(22), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-5-22
Gómez, M. F. y Moreno, L. A. (2016). Biodiversidad 2015 en cifras. En M. F. Gómez, L. A. Moreno, G. I. Andrade y C. Rueda (Eds.), Biodiversidad 2015. Estado y tendencias de la biodiversidad continental de Colombia (pp. 10-13). Instituto Alexander von Humboldt. http://repository.humboldt.org.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.11761/9305/IAVH_Biodiversidad_2015_WEB.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Goyenechea, I. (2007). Sistemática: Su historia, sus métodos y sus aplicaciones en las serpientes del género Conopsis. Ciencia ergo sum, 14(1), 54-62. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10414107
Hilgert, N. (2007). La etnobotánica como herramienta para el estudio de los sistemas de clasificación tradicionales. En A. Contreras-Ramos, C. Cuevas-Cardona, I. Goyenechea y U. Iturbe (Eds.), La sistemática, base del conocimiento de la biodiversidad (pp. 103–111). Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Irene_Goyenechea2/publication/268817766_La_sistematica_base_del_conocimiento_de_la_biodiversidad/links/5478b9010cf293e2da2b2b3c/La-sistematica-base-del-conocimiento-de-la-biodiversidad.pdf
Huddart-Kennedy, E., Beckley, T. M., McFarlane, B. L. y Nadeau, S. (2009). Rural-Urban differences in environmental concern in Canada. Rural Sociology, 74(3), 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1526/003601109789037268
Johnson, S. C. y Carey, S. (1998). Knowledge enrichment and conceptual change in folkbiology: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Cognitive Psychology, 37(2), 156-200. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0695
Kane, S. C. (2015). Bird names and folklore from the Emberá (Chocó) in Darién, Panamá. Ethnobiology Letters, 6(1), 32-62. https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.6.1.2015.226
Kellert, S. R. (1984). Attitudes toward animals: Age-Related development among children. En M. W. Fox y L. D. Mickley (Eds.), Advances in animal welfare science (Vol. 85, pp. 43-60). The Humane Society of the United States.
Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2002). The Influence of an educational program on children’s perception of biodiversity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 33(2), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960209600805
Lindemann-Matthies, P. y Bose, E. (2008). How many species are there? Public understanding and awareness of biodiversity in Switzerland. Human Ecology, 36(5), 731-742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-008-9194-1
Mace, G. M. (2004). The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359(1444), 711-719. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1454
Palmberg, I., Berg, I., Jeronen, E., Kärkkäinen, S., Norrgård-Sillanpää, P., Persson, C., Vilkonis, R. y Yli-Panula, E. (2015). Nordic-Baltic student teachers’ identification of and interest in plant and animal species: The importance of species identification and biodiversity for sustainable development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(6), 549-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9438-z
Paraskevopoulos, S., Padeliadu, S. y Zafiropoulos, K. (1998). Environmental knowledge of elementary school students in Greece. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969809599119
Petrovska, S., Sivevska, D. y Cackov, O. (2013). Role of the game in the development of preschool child. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 880-884. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.770
Raven, P. H., Berlin, B. y Breedlove, D. E. (1971). The Origins of taxonomy. Science, 174(4015), 1210-1213. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.174.4015.1210
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M. y Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X
Ross, N., Medin, D., Coley, J. D. y Atran, S. (2003). Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cognitive Development, 18(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00142-9
Rozzi, R., Massardo, F., Silander, J. Jr., Anderson, C. y Marín, A. (2003). Capítulo II. Conservación biocultural y ética ambiental en el extremo austral de América: Oportunidades y dificultades para el bienestar ecosocial. En E. Figueroa y J. A. Simonetti (Eds.), Globalización y biodiversidad: Oportunidades y desafíos para la sociedad chilena (pp. 51-85). Editorial Universitaria.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
