Real-time Boredom Evaluation Technique in College Students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.26-3.21

Keywords:

Boredom, Boredome Scale, Learning, teaching

Abstract

Introduction. Various studies have associated boredom in educational processes with a variety of negative effects. It is believed that boredom is caused by a failure in the environment to fulfill our need for motivation. Many tools (scales) have been developed to measure it. However, these scales are designed to measure global boredom, that is, at the end of the process, not in its stages. The present study seeks to develop a methodology to evaluate the effect of boredom in the stages of a university class to have a tool for the quantitative evaluation of specific activities. Method. This study proposed a boredom measurement scale with a minimally disruptive intervention tool. The data obtained undergo mathematical processing to reduce the effect of subjectivity (perceived level of boredom) on the scale. The proposed methodology was applied to a group of students from the University of Costa Rica. Results. The most important result was the correlation between specific activities in a class and the gradient of boredom. Discussion. The reduction in the variability between students achieved with mathematical processing allows the proposed methodology to be used for the quantitative analysis of the stages of a class based on perceived boredom. This information can be used to design learning processes focused not only on the global process but on each stage of it, which, to the best of our knowledge, is not achieved by any of the commonly used scales.

Author Biographies

Leonardo Garro-Mena, Universidad de Costa Rica

Licenciado en Ingeniería Química y Magíster en Ingeniería Química con énfasis en Ingeniería Ambiental por la Universidad de Costa Rica. Doctor en Ingeniería Química por Kansas State university. Ha trabajado como investigador y docente en la Universidad de Costa Rica, así como miembro de la red para la innovación docente RedIC-UCR, de la Universidad de Costa Rica, ha realizado publicaciones en el ámbito de la docencia, la difusión y la investigación científica.

Jenny Andrea Calderón-Castro, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Licenciada en Ingeniería Química y Bachiller en Diseño Plástico con énfasis en Diseño Cerámico por la Universidad de Costa Rica. Magíster en Patrimonio Cultural por la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Ha trabajado como investigadora y docente universitaria, con un especial enfoque transdisciplinar por medio del desarrollo de proyectos de difusión científica y acción social. En la actualidad realiza investigación y gestión en el ámbito cultural.

References

Acee, T. W., Kim, H., Kim, H. J., Kim, J.-I., Chu, H.-N. R., Kim, M., Cho, Y., & Wicker, F. W. (2010). Academic boredom in under - and over- challenging situations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.08.002

Belton, T., & Priyadharshini, E. (2007). Boredom and Schooling: A cross-disciplinary exploration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(4), 579-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640701706227

Eastwood, J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Smilek, D. (2012). The unengaged mind: Defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 482-495. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44280796

Fahlman, S. A., Mercer-Lynn, K. B., Flora, D. B., & Eastwood, J. D. (2013). Development and validation of the multidimensional state boredom scale. Assessment, 20(1), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111421303

Farmer, R., & Sundberg, N. D. (1986). Boredom proneness--The development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5001_2

Gjesme, T. (1977). General satisfaction and boredom at school as a function of the pupils’ personality characteristics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 21(1), 113-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383770210106

Gomez-Ramirez, J., & Costa, T. (2017). Boredom begets creativity: A solution to the exploitation–exploration trade-off in predictive coding. Biosystems, 162, 168-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.04.006

Hunter, J. A., Abraham, E. H., Hunter, A. G., Goldberg, L. C., & Eastwood, J. D. (2016). Personality and boredom proneness in the prediction of creativity and curiosity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 48-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.08.002

Isacescu, J., Struk, A. A., & Danckert, J. (2017). Cognitive and affective predictors of boredom proneness. Cognition and Emotion, 31(8), 1741-1748. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1259995

Maroldo, G. K. (1986). Shyness, boredom, and grade point average among college students. Psychological Reports, 59(2), 395-398. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1986.59.2.395

Mikulas, W. L., & Vodanovich, S. J. (1993). The essence of boredom. Psychological Record, 43(1), 3-12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229059999_The_essence_of_boredom

Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., & Daniels, L. M. (2010). What to do when feeling bored?: Students’ strategies for coping with boredom. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 626-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.004

Schwartze, M. M., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., Reck, C., Marx, A. K. G., & Fiedler, D. (2021). Boredom makes me sick: Adolescents’ boredom trajectories and their health-related quality of life. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126308

Struk, A. A., Carriere, J. S. A., Cheyne, J. A., & Danckert, J. (2017). A short boredom proneness scale: Development and psychometric properties. Assessment, 24(3), 346-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115609996

Vodanovich, S. J. (2003). Psychometric measures of boredom: A review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 137(6), 569-595. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980309600636

Vodanovich, S. J., & Watt, J. D. (2016). Self-report measures of boredom: An updated review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 150(2), 196-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1074531

Watt, J. D., & Hargis, M. B. (2010). Boredom proneness: Its relationship with subjective underemployment, perceived organizational support, and job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(1), 163-174. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40605754

Watt, J. D., & Vodanovich, S. J. (1999). Boredom proneness and psychosocial development. The Journal of Psychology, 133(3), 303-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989909599743

Published

2022-08-22

How to Cite

Real-time Boredom Evaluation Technique in College Students (L. Garro-Mena & J. A. Calderón-Castro , Trans.). (2022). Revista Electrónica Educare, 26(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.26-3.21

Issue

Section

Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed Section)

How to Cite

Real-time Boredom Evaluation Technique in College Students (L. Garro-Mena & J. A. Calderón-Castro , Trans.). (2022). Revista Electrónica Educare, 26(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.26-3.21

Comentarios (ver términos de uso)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 187

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.