Real-time Boredom Evaluation Technique in College Students

Keywords: Boredom, Boredome Scale, Learning, teaching


Introduction. Various studies have associated boredom in educational processes with a variety of negative effects. It is believed that boredom is caused by a failure in the environment to fulfill our need for motivation. Many tools (scales) have been developed to measure it. However, these scales are designed to measure global boredom, that is, at the end of the process, not in its stages. The present study seeks to develop a methodology to evaluate the effect of boredom in the stages of a university class to have a tool for the quantitative evaluation of specific activities. Method. This study proposed a boredom measurement scale with a minimally disruptive intervention tool. The data obtained undergo mathematical processing to reduce the effect of subjectivity (perceived level of boredom) on the scale. The proposed methodology was applied to a group of students from the University of Costa Rica. Results. The most important result was the correlation between specific activities in a class and the gradient of boredom. Discussion. The reduction in the variability between students achieved with mathematical processing allows the proposed methodology to be used for the quantitative analysis of the stages of a class based on perceived boredom. This information can be used to design learning processes focused not only on the global process but on each stage of it, which, to the best of our knowledge, is not achieved by any of the commonly used scales.

Author Biographies

Leonardo Garro-Mena, Universidad de Costa Rica

Licenciado en Ingeniería Química y Magíster en Ingeniería Química con énfasis en Ingeniería Ambiental por la Universidad de Costa Rica. Doctor en Ingeniería Química por Kansas State university. Ha trabajado como investigador y docente en la Universidad de Costa Rica, así como miembro de la red para la innovación docente RedIC-UCR, de la Universidad de Costa Rica, ha realizado publicaciones en el ámbito de la docencia, la difusión y la investigación científica.

Jenny Andrea Calderón-Castro, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Licenciada en Ingeniería Química y Bachiller en Diseño Plástico con énfasis en Diseño Cerámico por la Universidad de Costa Rica. Magíster en Patrimonio Cultural por la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Ha trabajado como investigadora y docente universitaria, con un especial enfoque transdisciplinar por medio del desarrollo de proyectos de difusión científica y acción social. En la actualidad realiza investigación y gestión en el ámbito cultural.


Acee, T. W., Kim, H., Kim, H. J., Kim, J.-I., Chu, H.-N. R., Kim, M., Cho, Y., & Wicker, F. W. (2010). Academic boredom in under - and over- challenging situations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 17-27.

Belton, T., & Priyadharshini, E. (2007). Boredom and Schooling: A cross-disciplinary exploration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(4), 579-596.

Eastwood, J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Smilek, D. (2012). The unengaged mind: Defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 482-495.

Fahlman, S. A., Mercer-Lynn, K. B., Flora, D. B., & Eastwood, J. D. (2013). Development and validation of the multidimensional state boredom scale. Assessment, 20(1), 68-85.

Farmer, R., & Sundberg, N. D. (1986). Boredom proneness--The development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(1), 4-17.

Gjesme, T. (1977). General satisfaction and boredom at school as a function of the pupils’ personality characteristics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 21(1), 113-146.

Gomez-Ramirez, J., & Costa, T. (2017). Boredom begets creativity: A solution to the exploitation–exploration trade-off in predictive coding. Biosystems, 162, 168-176.

Hunter, J. A., Abraham, E. H., Hunter, A. G., Goldberg, L. C., & Eastwood, J. D. (2016). Personality and boredom proneness in the prediction of creativity and curiosity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 48-57.

Isacescu, J., Struk, A. A., & Danckert, J. (2017). Cognitive and affective predictors of boredom proneness. Cognition and Emotion, 31(8), 1741-1748.

Maroldo, G. K. (1986). Shyness, boredom, and grade point average among college students. Psychological Reports, 59(2), 395-398.

Mikulas, W. L., & Vodanovich, S. J. (1993). The essence of boredom. Psychological Record, 43(1), 3-12.

Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., & Daniels, L. M. (2010). What to do when feeling bored?: Students’ strategies for coping with boredom. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 626-638.

Schwartze, M. M., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., Reck, C., Marx, A. K. G., & Fiedler, D. (2021). Boredom makes me sick: Adolescents’ boredom trajectories and their health-related quality of life. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 1-13.

Struk, A. A., Carriere, J. S. A., Cheyne, J. A., & Danckert, J. (2017). A short boredom proneness scale: Development and psychometric properties. Assessment, 24(3), 346-359.

Vodanovich, S. J. (2003). Psychometric measures of boredom: A review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 137(6), 569-595.

Vodanovich, S. J., & Watt, J. D. (2016). Self-report measures of boredom: An updated review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 150(2), 196-228.

Watt, J. D., & Hargis, M. B. (2010). Boredom proneness: Its relationship with subjective underemployment, perceived organizational support, and job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(1), 163-174.

Watt, J. D., & Vodanovich, S. J. (1999). Boredom proneness and psychosocial development. The Journal of Psychology, 133(3), 303-314.

How to Cite
Garro-Mena, L., & Calderón-Castro, J. (2022). Real-time Boredom Evaluation Technique in College Students. Revista Electrónica Educare, 26(3), 1-11.

Comentarios (ver términos de uso)