GEOGRAFIA, ECOLOGIA POLÍTICA E MUDANÇA TRANSFORMADORA NO SÉCULO 21
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/rgac.74-1.13Palavras-chave:
sustentabilidade, mudança social, geografia crítica, relações sociedade-naturezaResumo
Desde a mudança normativa na Geografia na década de 1970, a Ecologia Política tem sido um campo dinâmico que busca compreender as causas profundas dos desafios socioambientais e, ao mesmo tempo, propor soluções. Este artigo reflete sobre a potencial contribuição do campo geográfico da Ecologia Política para a mudança transformadora necessária para orientar a sociedade para a sustentabilidade no século XXI, à luz dos desafios prementes. Isso é conseguido primeiro identificando três eixos concretos e sobrepostos da contribuição da Ecologia Política para a mudança transformadora com base nas abordagens temáticas gerais desse campo e, em seguida, relacionando a Ecologia Política com as recentes estruturas analítico-conceituais sobre mudança transformadora. Finalmente, algumas áreas de melhoria na Ecologia Política são sugeridas para fortalecer ainda mais a contribuição para a mudança transformadora.
Referências
Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Duke University Press.
Armstrong McKay, D. I., Staal, A., Abrams, J. F., Winkelmann, R., Sakschewski, B., Loriani, S., Fetzer, I., Cornell, S. E., Rockström, J. y Lenton, T. M. (2022). Exceeding 1.5 C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science, 377(6611).
Balvanera, P. y Ávalos, H. C. (2007). Los servicios ecosistémicos y la toma de decisiones: Retos y perspectivas. Gaceta Ecológica, 84, 117-122.
Balvanera, P., Castillo, A., Ávila, P., Caballero, K., Flores, A., Galicia, C., Galindo, L. M., Lazos-Chavero, E., Martínez, Y., Maass, M. et al. (2011). Marcos conceptuales interdisciplinarios para el estudio de los servicios ecosistémicos en América Latina. En P. Laterra, E. Jobbágy y J. Paruelo (Eds.), Valoración de servicios ecosistémicos: Conceptos, herramientas y aplicaciones para el ordenamiento territorial (pp. 39-68). Ediciones INTA.
Benjaminsen, T. A. y Svarstad, H. (2021). Political ecology: A critical engagement with global environmental issues. Springer Nature.
Bjork-James, C., Checker, M. y Edelman, M. (2022). Transnational social movements: Environmentalist, indigenous, and agrarian visions for planetary futures. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 47, 583-608.
Blaikie, P. M. y Brookfield, H. C. (1987). Land degradation and society. Methuen.
Braun, B. (2015). From critique to experiment? Rethinking political ecology for the Anthropocene. En T. Perreault, G. Bridge y J. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology (pp. 102-114). Routledge.
Calvet-Mir, L., Corbera, E., Martin, A., Fisher, J. y Gross-Camp, N. (2015). Payments for ecosystem services in the tropics: A closer look at effectiveness and equity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 150-162.
Carney, J. (2004). Gender conflict in the Gambian Wetlands. En R. Peet y M. Watts (Eds.), Liberation Ecologies: Environment, development, social movements (Segunda edición, pp. 316-335). Routledge.
Chan, K. M., Boyd, D. R., Gould, R. K., Jetzkowitz, J., Liu, J., Muraca, B., Naidoo, R., Olmsted, P., Satterfield, T., Selomane, O., Singh, G. G., Sumaila, R., Ngo, H. T., Boedhihartono, A. K., Agard, J., De Aguiar, A. P. D., Armenteras, D., Balint, L., Barrington‐Leigh, C., … Brondízio, E. S. (2020). Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability. People and Nature, 2(3), 693-717.
Clark, W. y Dickson, N. (2003). Sustainability Science: The Emerging Research Program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 14, 8059. https://doi.org/10.2307/3139879
Clark, W. y Harley, A. (2019). Sustainability science: Towards a synthesis (Sustainability Science Program Working Paper 2019-01). Harvard University.
Collard, R. y Dempsey, J. (2017). Capitalist Natures in Five Orientations. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28(1), 78-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1202294
Cusicanqui, S. R. (2012). Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: A Reflection on the Practices and Discourses of Decolonization. South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(1), 95-109.
Delgado Mahecha, O. (2003). Debates sobre el espacio en la geografía contemporánea. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Unibiblos.
Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J. R., Arico, S., Báldi, A. y others. (2015). The IPBES Conceptual Framework—Connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1-16.
Díaz-Reviriego, I., Turnhout, E. y Beck, S. (2019). Participation and inclusiveness in the intergovernmental science–policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Nature Sustainability, 2(6), 457-464.
Dupuis, L., Leandre, C., Langridge, J., Delavaud, A., Jactel, H. y Soubelet, H. (2023). Analyzing the capacity to initiate transformative change: A methodology for assessing biodiversity strategies. Biodiversity and Conservation, 32(11), 3641-3660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-023-02660-5
Espinoza Cisneros, É. y Blanco Ramírez, S. (2020). Metodologías participativas aplicadas a la socio-hidrología y su potencial para la incidencia social: Algunas reflexiones. Revista Reflexiones, 99(2), 125-158.
Espinoza-Cisneros, E. y Akhter, M. (2020). “Walking the talk” in land management: Structural factors influencing pro-environmental intention-action links in a tropical watershed. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 334-344.
Espinoza-Cisneros, E. y Álvarez-Vargas, L. (2021). Reflexiones teórico-conceptuales sobre el binario Agencia-Estructura desde la Geografía Ambiental. Estudios Geográficos, 82(290).
Fairhead, J. y Leach, M. (1995). False forest history, complicit social analysis: Rethinking some West African environmental narratives. World Development, 23(6), 1023-1035.
Friis, C., Nielsen, J. Ø., Otero, I., Haberl, H., Niewöhner, J. y Hostert, P. (2016). From teleconnection to telecoupling: Taking stock of an emerging framework in land system science. Journal of Land Use Science, 11(2), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2015.1096423
Harvey, D. (1974). What kind of geography for what kind of public policy? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 18-24.
Holt-Jensen, A. (2009). Geography: History and Concepts. SAGE.
Hull, V. y Liu, J. (2018). Telecoupling: A new frontier for global sustainability. Ecology & Society, 23(4).
IPBES. (2019a). El Informe de la Evaluación Mundial sobre la diversidad biológica y los servicios de los ecosistemas-Resumen para los encargados de la formulación de políticas. Plataforma Intergubernamental Científico-Normativa sobre Biodiversidad y Servicios Ecosistémicos (IPBES).
IPBES. (2019b). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (p. 56). Plataforma Intergubernamental Científico-Normativa sobre Biodiversidad y Servicios Ecosistémicos (IPBES).
IPCC. (2023). Summary for Policymakers. En: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Panel Intergubernamental sobre Cambio Climático (IPCC).
Karlsson, B. G. (2015). Political ecology: Anthropological perspectives. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 18(2), 350355.
Kull, C. A., de Sartre, X. A. y Castro-Larrañaga, M. (2015). The political ecology of ecosystem services. Geoforum, 61, 122-134.
McEvoy, J. (2014). Desalination and water security: The promise and perils of a technological fix to the water crisis in Baja California Sur, Mexico. Water Alternatives, 7(3), 518-541.
Meyfroidt, P., De Bremond, A., Ryan, C. M., Archer, E., Aspinall, R., Chhabra, A., Camara, G., Corbera, E., DeFries, R., Díaz, S. et al. (2022). Ten facts about land systems for sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(7).
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. (2015). Fostering transformative research in the geographical sciences. The National Academies Press.
Neumann, R. P. (2005). Making political ecology. Hodder Arnold.
Newig, J., Challies, E., Cotta, B., Lenschow, A. y Schilling-Vacaflor, A. (2020). Governing global telecoupling toward environmental sustainability. Ecology & Society, 25(4).
O’Brien, K. (2018). Is the 1.5 C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 153-160.
Osborne, T. y Shapiro-Garza, E. (2018). Embedding Carbon Markets: Complicating Commodification of Ecosystem Services in Mexico’s Forests. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(1), 88-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1343657
Patterson, J. J., Thaler, T., Hoffmann, M., Hughes, S., Oels, A., Chu, E., Mert, A., Huitema, D., Burch, S. y Jordan, A. (2018). Political feasibility of 1.5 C societal transformations: The role of social justice. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 1-9.
Peluso, N. L. (1993). Coercing conservation? The politics of state resource control. Global Environmental Change, 3(2), 199-217.
Pollard, J., Henry, N., Bryson, J. y Daniels, P. (2000). Shades of grey? Geographers and policy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25(2), 243-248.
Quijano, A. (1999). Colonialidad del poder, cultura y conocimiento en América Latina. Dispositio, 24(51), 137-148.
Robbins, P. (2004). Political ecology: A critical introduction. Blackwell Pub.
Robbins, P., Chhatre, A. y Karanth, K. (2015). Political Ecology of Commodity Agroforests and Tropical Biodiversity. Conservation Letters, 8(2), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12169
Rocheleau, D. (2008). Political ecology in the key of policy: From chains of explanation to webs of relation. Geoforum, 39(2), 716-727.
Rocheleau, D., Thomas-Slayter, B. y Wangari, E. (Eds.). (1996). Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experience. Routledge.
Schroeder, R. A. y Suryanata, K. (2004). Gender and class power in agroforestry systems: Case studies from Indonesia and West Africa. En R. Peet y M. Watts (Eds.), Liberation Ecologies: Environment, development, social movements (Segunda edición, pp. 299-315). Routledge.
Sen, A. (2013). The Ends and Means of Sustainability. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2012.747492
Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C. P., Barnosky, A. D., Cornell, S. E., Crucifix, M., Donges, J. F., Fetzer, I., Lade, S. J., Scheffer, M., Winkelmann, R. y Schellnhuber, H. J. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201810141. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115
Turner, B. L. y Robbins, P. (2008). Land-change science and political ecology: Similarities, differences, and implications for sustainability science. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33.
UNESCO. (2013). The contribution of indigenous and local knowledge systems to IPBES: building synergies with science. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Ward, K. (2007). Geography and public policy: Activist, participatory, and policy geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 695-705.
Wellmann, T., Lausch, A., Andersson, E., Knapp, S., Cortinovis, C., Jache, J., Scheuer, S., Kremer, P., Mascarenhas, A., Kraemer, R., Haase, A., Schug, F. y Haase, D. (2020). Remote sensing in urban planning: Contributions towards ecologically sound policies? Landscape and Urban Planning, 204, 103921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103921
Wutich, A., Brewis, A., York, A. M. y Stotts, R. (2013). Rules, norms, and injustice: A cross-cultural study of perceptions of justice in water institutions. Society & Natural Resources, 26(7), 795-809.
Zanotti, L. y Suiseeya, K. M. (2020). Doing feminist collaborative event ethnography. Journal of Political Ecology, 27(1), 961-987.
Zimmerer, K. S. (2004). Environmental discourses on soil degradation in Bolivia: Sustainability and the search for socioenvironmental “middle ground”. En R. Peet y M. Watts (Eds.), Liberation Ecologies: Environment, development, social movements (Segunda edición, pp. 107-124). Routledge.
Zimmerer, K. S. y Bassett, T. J. (Eds.). (2003). Political Ecology: An integrative approach to geography and environment-development studies. Guilford Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Edgar Espinoza-Cisneros, Fernanda Rojas-Marchini
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Política proposta para revistas que oferecem Acesso Aberto
Os autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a. Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e garantem à revista o direito de ser a primeira publicação do trabalho, sob a Licença Creative Commons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es, que permite que outros compartilhar com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e da publicação inicial nesta revista.
b. Os autores podem estabelecer separadamente acordos adicionais para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicado na revista (por exemplo, colocá-la em repositório institucional ou publicá-la em livro), com reconhecimento de sua publicação inicial nesta revista. Esses acordos adicionais devem respeitar os termos da licença: ou seja: não envolver lucro e compartilhar com a mesma licença.
c. Os autores são incentivados a arquivar a versão/PDF pós-impressão ou do editor em repositórios de acesso aberto.
REVGEO está licenciado sob https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es
.svg_4.png){kind=logo}
_(1).png){kind=logo}
_(1)_(1)_(1)_1.png){kind=logo}
(2)(1)(1)(1).png){kind=logo}
