Cognitive and social skills in collaborative solution of mathematical problems




Collaborative Problem Solving, mathematical tasks, social skills, cognitive skills, graph theory


[Objective] The objective of this study was to analyze the cognitive and social skills of a group of students and their teacher in an exercise based on Collaborative Problem Solving (CPR) in Mathematics. [Methodology] A study was carried out by selecting one of the 8 groups of 4 students randomly assigned in a non-curricular exercise scheduled in 24 biweekly sessions of 90 minutes. The group selected consisted of 4 female students. The sessions were recorded, and data on the interactions between subjects (students and teacher) were coded at the beginning and at the end of the exercise for factors including skills of representation, regulation, communication and roles assumed in group work, and interaction with the teacher. The coded data were subsequently analyzed using asymmetric graph analysis techniques to measure the intensity of interactions, and correspondence analysis to determine the significance of relationships between the sub-skills involved. Rstudio software was used to carry out the analysis. [Results] A significant change in the intensity of interactions between participants was observed throughout the implementation with respect to the centrality and closeness indices associated with the graphs obtained. [Conclusions] The systematic CPR work in mathematics carried out in the exercise promotes and modifies social and cognitive skills and their interaction.


Araujo, R. C., & Gadanidis, G. (2020). Online collaborative mind mapping in a mathematics teacher education program: a study on student interaction and knowledge construction. ZDM, 52(5), 943-958.

Andrews-Todd, J., & Forsyth, C. M. (2020). Exploring social and cognitive dimensions of collaborative problem solving in an open online simulation-based task. Computers in human behavior, 104, 105-759.

Brodbeck, F. C., & Greitemeyer, T. (2000). Effects of individual versus mixed individual and group experience in rule induction on group member learning and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(6), 621-648.

Camacho-Morles, J., Slemp, G. R., Oades, L. G., Morrish, L., & Scoular, C. (2019). The role of achieve- ment emotions in the collaborative problem-solving performance of adolescents. Learning and Individual Differences, 70, 169–181.

Care, E. (2018). Twenty-first century skills: From theory to action. Educational Assessment in an Information Age, 3-17.

Care, E., Griffin, P., Scoular, C., Awwal, N., & Zoanetti, N. (2015). Collaborative problem solving tasks. Educational Assessment in an Information Age, 85-104.

Carlana, M. (2019). Implicit Stereotypes: Evidence from Teachers’ Gender Bias. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(3), 1163–1224, 10.1093/qje/qjz008

Chan, M. Ch. E., & Clarke, D. (2017). Structured affordances in the use of open-ended tasks to facilitate collaborative problem solving. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 951–963.

Chung, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, S., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). Enhancing students’ communication skills in the science classroom through socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 1-27.

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.

Cooke, N. J., Kiekel, P. A., Salas, E., Stout, R., Bowers, C., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (2003). Measuring team knowledge: A window to the cognitive underpinnings of team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(3), 179–199.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.

DiDonato, N. C. (2013). Effective self- and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional Science, 41, 25–47.

Dowell, N. M., Lin, Y., Godfrey, A., & Brooks, C. (2020). Exploring the Relationship between Emergent Sociocognitive Roles, Collaborative Problem-Solving Skills, and Outcomes: A Group Communication Analysis. Journal of Learning Analytics, 7(1), 38-57.

Dreher, A., & Kuntze, S. (2015). Teachers’ professional knowledge and noticing: The case of multiple representations in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88, 89–114.

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.

Fiore, S. M., Carter, D. R., & Asencio, R. (2015). Conflict, trust, and cohesion: Examining affective and attitudinal factors in science teams. In E. Salas, W. B. Vessey & A. X. Estrada (Eds.), Team Cohesion: Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice, 271-301. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Gentrup, S., & Rjosk, C. (2018). Pygmalion and the gender gap: do teacher expectations contribute to differences in achievement between boys and girls at the beginning of schooling? Educational Research and Evaluation, 24(3-5), 295-323,

Goffman, E. (1972). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin University Books.

Graesser, A. C., Fiore, S. M., Greiff, S., Andrews-Todd, J., Foltz, P. W., & Hesse, F. W. (2018). Advancing the science of collaborative problem solving. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(2), 59-92.

Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2015). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Educational Assessment in an Information Age.

Gu, X., Chen, S., & Zhu, W. (2015). An intervention framework designed to develop the collaborative problem-solving skills of primary school students. Education Tech Research Dev, 63, 143–159.

Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. In P. Griffin and E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Educational Assessment in an Information Age, 37-56.

Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American educational research journal, 27(1), 29-63.

Laughlin, P. R. (2013). Group problem solving. Princeton University Press.

Law, V., Ge, X., & Eseryel, D. (2016). The Development of a Self-regulation in a Collaborative Context Scale. Tech Know Learn, 21, 243–253.

Linzer, D. A., & Lewis, J. B. (2011). An R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. Journal of statistical software, 42(10), 1-29.

Marchant, P., Cornejo, C., & Felmer, P. (2022). Student Insights in Mathematics Problem Solving: Cognition, Affect, and Gesture. Int J of Sci and Math Educ.

Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.

Müller, A., Bellhäuser, H., Konert, J., & Röpke, R. (2021). Effects of group formation on student satisfaction and performance: a field experiment. Small Group Research, (2), 244-273.

OCDE. (2017). PISA 2015 Collaborative problem solving Framework, PISA, OCDE Publishing, Paris.

Pekrun, R. (2019). Achievement emotions: A control-value theory perspective. In R. Patulny, A. Bellocchi, R. E. Olson, S. Khorana, J. McKenzie. & M. Peterie (Eds.), Emotions in late modernity,142–157. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Peterson, R. S., & Behfar, K. J. (2004). Leadership as group regulation. In The psychology of leadership, 157-178. Psychology Press.

Pruner, M., & Liljedahl, P. (2021). Collaborative problem solving in a choice-affluent environment. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 1-18.

Recber, S., Isiksal, M., & Koc, Y. (2017). Investigando la autoeficacia, la ansiedad, las actitudes y los logros de las matemáticas con respecto al género y el tipo de escuela. Anales de Psicología, 34(1), 41–51.

Roschelle, J. & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 69–97.

Saadati, F., Chandia, E., Cerda, G. (2021). Self-efficacy, practices, and their relationships; the impact of a professional development program for mathematics teachers. J Math Teacher Educ.

Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. Liberal education in a knowledge society, 97, 67-98.

Smith, J. M., & Mancy, R. (2018). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive and collaborative talk during group mathematical problem-solving – what do we mean by collaborative metacognition?. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 14-36.

Scoular, C., & Care, E. (2020). Monitoring patterns of social and cognitive student behaviors in online collaborative problem solving assessments. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 105-874.

Stadler, M., Herborn, K., Mustafić, M. & Greiff, S. (2020). The assessment of collaborative problem solving in PISA 2015: An investigation of the validity of the PISA 2015 CPS tasks. Computers & Education, 157, 103-964.

Stasser, G., & Abele, S. (2020). Collective choice, collaboration, and communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 589-612.

Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journal, 10(4), 313-340.

Tang, P., Liu, H., & Wen, H. (2021, April). Factors Predicting Collaborative Problem Solving: Based on the Data From PISA 2015. In Frontiers in Education, 6, 130. Frontiers.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.

Trötschel, R., Hüffmeier, J., Loschelder, D. D., Schwartz, K., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2011). Perspective taking as a means to overcome motivational barriers in negotiations: When putting oneself into the opponent's shoes helps to walk toward agreements. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101(4), 771.

UNESCO. (2017). Report E2030: Education and skills for the 21st century. Regional Meeting of Ministers of Education of Latin America and the Caribbean, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.

Von Davier, A. A., Zhu, M. & Kyllonen, P. C. (Eds.). (2017). Innovative assessment of collaboration. Springer.

Webb, N. M., Ing, M., Burnheimer, E., Johnson, N. C., Franke, M. L., & Zimmerman, J. (2021). Is there a right way? Productive patterns of interaction during collaborative problem solving. Education Sciences, 11(5), 214.

Zhuang, X., MacCann, C., Wang, L., Liu, L., & Roberts, R. D. (2008). Development and validity evidence supporting a teamwork and collaboration assessment for high school students. ETS Research Report Series, (2), i-51.



How to Cite

Cognitive and social skills in collaborative solution of mathematical problems. (2022). Uniciencia, 36(1), 1-26.



Original scientific papers (evaluated by academic peers)

How to Cite

Cognitive and social skills in collaborative solution of mathematical problems. (2022). Uniciencia, 36(1), 1-26.

Comentarios (ver términos de uso)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 > >>