Innovation in the University Classroom Through Augmented Reality. Analysis From the Perspective of the Spanish and Latin American Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.25-3.1Keywords:
Technological education, augmented reality, educational apps, university innovationAbstract
Objective. This article analyzes the experiences of university innovation with immersive technologies (Augmented Reality, RA) of various degree programs at the Pablo de Olavide University of Seville (Spain) and the Catholic University of Santiago de Guayaquil (Ecuador) corresponding to the academic year 2018-2019. Method. Through a mixed methodology of data analysis (quantitative and qualitative) and the design of an ad hoc questionnaire of own elaboration, the perceptions of 202 students were analyzed in relation to the advantages and disadvantages of the RA and the Augmented Reality apps used in the Emerging Technologies seminars in educational contexts, taught in both universities. Results. The results show that the most valued mobile applications were QuiverVisión and HP Reveal because of their interactivity, wearable environment, and educational projection in formative contexts, especially at early ages. Conclusions. Students perceive the development of cognitive skills and the development of competencies as the main advantages of RA. Likewise, as main disadvantages, the need for university teacher training for classroom implementation and the possible adverse effects of the digital divide.
References
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. En T. Ronald Azuma. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments (pp. 6355-6385). MIT Press.
Barroso Osuna, J. M. y Gallego Pérez, Ó. M. (2017). Producción de recursos de aprendizaje apoyados en realidad aumentada por parte de estudiantes de magisterio. Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC, 6(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v6i1.5806
Billinghurst, M. y Dunser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56-63. 10.1109/MC.2012.111
Blas Padilla, D., Vázquez-Cano, E., Morales Cevallos, M. B. y López Meneses, E. (2019). Uso de apps de realidad aumentada en las aulas universitarias. Campus Virtuales, 8(1), 37-48. http://uajournals.com/ojs/index.php/campusvirtuales/article/view/379
Bressler, D. M. y Bodzin, A. M. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students’ flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 505-517. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12008
Brinson, J. R. (2017). A further characterization of empirical research related to learning outcome achievement in remote and virtual science labs. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(5), 546-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9699-8
Cabero-Almenara, J., Vázquez-Cano, E. y López-Meneses, E. (2018). Uso de la realidad aumentada como recurso didáctico en la enseñanza universitaria. Formación Universitaria, 11(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062018000100004
Cabero Almenara, J., Vázquez-Cano, E., López Meneses, E. y Jaén Martínez, A. (2020). Posibilidades formativas de la tecnología aumentada. Un estudio diacrónico en escenarios universitarios. Revista Complutense de Educación, 31(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.61934
Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. Cell Biology Education, 6(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205
Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R. y Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens. With eight proficiency levels and examples of use. European Union. https://doi. org/10.2760/38842
Chang, H.-Y. (2018). Students’ representational competence with drawing technology across two domains of science. Science Education, 102(5), 1129-1149. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21457
Chang, H.-Y., Wu, H.-K. y Hsu, Y.-S. (2013). Integrating a mobile augmented reality activity to contextualize student learning of a socioscientific issue. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), E95-E99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01379.x
Chang, S.-C. y Hwang, G.-J. (2018). Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 125, 226-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.007
Chao, J., Chiu, J. L., DeJaegher, C. J. y Pan, E. A. (2016). Sensor-augmented virtual labs: Using physical interactions with science simulations to promote understanding of gas behavior. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 16-33. https://doi.org/0.1007/s10956-015-9574-4
Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H. y Hwang, G.‐J. (2014). An augmented reality‐based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Educational Technology y Society, 17(4), 352-365. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.4.352
Cózar Gutiérrez, R., de Moya Martínez, M. D. V., Hernández Bravo, J. A. y Hernández Bravo, J. R. (2015). Tecnologías emergentes para la enseñanza de las ciencias sociales. Una experiencia con el uso de realidad aumentada en la formación inicial de maestros. Digital Education Review, (27), 138-153. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2015.27.138-153
Fernández Robles, B. (2018). La utilización de objetos de aprendizaje de realidad aumentada en la enseñanza universitaria de educación primaria. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (9), 90-104. https://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/IJERI/article/view/2599
Fombona Cadavieco, J. y Vázquez-Cano, E. (2017). Posibilidades de utilización de la geolocalización y realidad aumentada en el ámbito educativo. Educación XX1, 20(2), 319-342. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.19046
Froehlich, D. E. 2018). Non-technological learning environments in a technological world: Flipping comes to the aid. Journal of new Approaches in Educational Research, 7(2), 88-92. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.7.304
Han, J. H., Jo, M., Hyun, E. y So, H.-J. (2015). Examining young children’s perception toward augmented reali- ty-infused dramatic play. Education Technology Research Development, 63(3), 455-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9374-9
Hood Cattaneo, K. (2017). Telling active learning pedagogies apart: From theory to practice. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(2), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.7.237
Hunsu, N. J., Adesope, O. y Bayly, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2015.11.013
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologías Educativas y de Formación del Profesorado. (2017). Marco común de competencia digital docente. http:// educalab.es/documents/10180/12809/MarcoComunCompeDigiDoceV2.pdf
Jiménez Hernández, D., Sancho Requena, P. y Sánchez Fuentes, S. (2019). Perfil del futuro docente: Nuevos retos en el marco de EEES. Contextos Educativos. Revista de Educación, (23), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.18172/con.3471
Kim. K., Hwang, J. y Zo, H. (2016). Understanding users’ continuance intention toward smartphone augmented reality applications. Information Development, 32(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666914535119
López Belmonte, J., Pozo Sánchez, S., Morales Cevallos, M. B. y López Meneses, E. (2019). Competencia digital de futuros docentes para efectuar un proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje mediante realidad virtual. EDUTEC. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 67, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2019.67.1327
Moreno Martínez, N. N. y Leiva Olivencia, J. J. (2017). Experiencias formativas de uso didáctico de la realidad aumentada con alumnado del grado de educación primaria en la universidad de Málaga. Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC, 6(1), 81-104. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v6i1.5809
Pedraza Goyeneche, C. E., Amado Plata, O. F., Lasso Cárdenas, E. y Munévar García, P. A. (2017). La experiencia de la realidad aumentada (RA) en la formación del profesorado en la Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia UNAD Colombia. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, (51), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2017.i51.08
Pool-Cibrian, W. J. y Martínez-Guerrero, J. I. (2013). Autoeficacia y uso de estrategias para el aprendizaje autorregulado en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 15(3), 21-37. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1607-40412013000300002&lng=es&tlng=es.
Rodríguez-García, A. M., Cáceres Reche, M. P. y Alonso García, S. (2018). La competencia digital del futuro docente: Análisis bibliométrico de la productividad científica indexada en Scopus. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (10), 317-333. https://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/IJERI/article/view/2960
Santos, M. E. C., Wolde Lüke, A. I., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, G., Rodrigo, M. M. T., Sandor, C. y Kato, H. (2016). Augmented reality as multimedia: The case for situated vocabulary learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0028-2.
Vázquez Cano, E. (2021). Medios, recursos didácticos y tecnología educativa. UNED.
Wojciechowski, R. y Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68, 570-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
