Adaptation and validation of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire scale in a sample of Portuguese adolescents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.29-1.18579Keywords:
Cyberbullying, cyberaggression, cybervictimization, scale, SDG 4, quality education, school environments, SDG 16, Peace, justice and strong institutions, cyberbullying victimization, bullying at schoolAbstract
Introduction. Cyberbullying has negative consequences for those involved and for the school environment, and it is important to have instruments that help detect and understand this phenomenon. Objective. This research aimed to translate and adapt, for the Portuguese population, the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire (ECIPQ), studying its psychometric properties. Methodology. Quantitative and cross-sectional study in which 440 secondary school students from schools in the north and center of Portugal participated. Result. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed good adjustment indexes allowing to confirm the factorial model of the original instrument consisting of two factors correlated with each other, namely cybervictimization and cyberaggression. The factors showed good internal consistency. Conclusion. The Portuguese version of the ECIPQ presents good psychometric characteristics, which legitimize its use in research and psychopedagogical intervention.
Downloads
References
Álvarez-García, D., Barreiro-Collazo, A., Núñez, J. C., & Dobarro, A. (2016). Validity and reliability of the Cyber-aggression Questionnaire for Adolescents (CYBA). The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8(2), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2016.02.003
Bai, Q., Huang, S., Hsueh, F.-H., & Zhang, T. (2021). Cyberbullying victimization and suicide ideation: A crumbled belief in a just world. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, Article 106679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106679
Brewer, G., & Kerslake, J. (2015). Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness. Computers in human behavior, 48, 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.073
Brighi, A., Ortega, R., Scheitauer, H., Smith, P. K., Tsormpatzoudis, C., Barkoukis, V., & del Rey, R. (2012). European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Qquestionnaire – (ECIPQ). Unpublished manuscript.
Buelga, S., Cava, M. J., Musitu, G., & Torralba, E. (2015). Cyberbullying aggressors among spanish secondary education students: An exploratory study. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 12(2), 100-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2014-0025
Buelga, S., Iranzo, B., Cava, M.-J., & Torralba, E. (2015). Psychological profile of adolescent cyberbullying aggressors. International Journal of Social Psychology, 30(2), 382-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2015.1016754
Buelga, S., Martínez-Ferrer, B., & Cava, M.-J. (2017). Differences in family climate and family communication among cyberbullies, cybervictims, and cyber bully victims in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 164-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.017
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
Carvalho, M., Branquinho, C., & de Matos, M. G. (2021). Cyberbullying and bullying: impact on psychological symptoms and well-being. Child Indicators Research,14, 435-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-020-09756-2
Chang, F.-C., Chiu, C.-H., Miao, N.-F., Chen, P.-H., Lee, C.-M., Chiang, J.-T., & Pan, Y.-C. (2015). (2015). The relationship between parental mediation and Internet addiction among adolescents, and the association with cyberbullying and depression. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 57, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.11.013
del Rey, R., Casas, J. A., & Ortega, R. (2016). Impact of the ConRed program on different cyberbulling roles. Aggressive behavior, 42(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21608
del Rey, R., Casas, J. A., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Smith, P., Thompson, F., Barkoukis, V., Tsorbatzoudis, H., Brighi, A., Guarini, A., Pyżalski, J., & Plichta, P. (2015). Structural validation and cross-cultural robustness of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.065
Flora, D. B. & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466-491. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466
Hambleton, R. (2001). The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.164
Hazler, R. J. (1996). Breaking the cycle of violence: Interventions for bullying and victimization. Accelerated Development.
Hernández Sampieri, Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Herrera-López, M., Casas, J. A., Romera, E. M., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & del Rey, R. (2017). Validation of the European cyberbullying intervention project questionnaire for Colombian Adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(2), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0414
Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2010.494133
Hou, D. (2023). The factors, impact, and interventions of cyberbullying in schools. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 345-353. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4272
Knauf, R.-K., Eschenbeck, H., & Hock, M. (2018). Bystanders of bullying: Social-cognitive and affective reactions to school bullying and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12(4). 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2018-4-3
Marôco, J. (2014). Análise de equações estruturais. Fundamentos teóricos, software & aplicações. ReportNumber.
Matos, A. P. M., Vieira, C. C., Amado, J., Pessoa, T., & Martins, M. J. D. (2018). Cyberbullying in portuguese schools: Prevalence and characteristics. Journal of school violence, 17(1), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2016.1263796
Menesini, E. & Spiel, C. (2012) Introduction: Cyberbullying: Development, consequences, risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 163-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.652833
Mishna, F., Scarcello, I., Pepler, D., & Wiener, J. (2005). Teacher´s understanding of bullying. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(4), 718-738. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126452
Moffitt, T. E. & Caspi, A. (2001). Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescent-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Development & Psychopathology, 13(2), 355-375. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579401002097
Olweus, D. & Limber, S. P. (2018). Some problems with cyberbullying research. Current opinion in psychology, 19, 139-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.012
Ortega Ruiz, R., del Rey Alamillo, R., & Casas, J. A. (2016). Evaluar el bullying y el cyberbullying validación española del EBIP-Q y del ECIP-Q. Psicología Educativa, 22(1), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2016.01.004
Ostrov, J. M. & Kamper, K. E. (2015). Future directions for research on the development of relational and physical peer victimization. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(3), 509-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1012723
Ponte, C., & Batista, S. (2019). EU Kids Online Portugal: Usos, competências, riscos e mediações da internet reportados por crianças e jovens (9-17 anos). Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
Relva, I., Simões, M., & Monteiro, A. P. (2022). Cyberbullying: A form of peer violence in the digital era. Em G. Sari (Ed.), Handbook of research on bullying in media and beyond (pp.156-174) IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5426-8.ch010
Sivabalan, T. V., Zaki, R. A., & Yuen, C. W. (2020). The prevalence of cyberbullying and its associated factors among young adolescents in Penang, Malaysia. Journal of Health and Translational Medicine (JUMMEC), 23, (Suppl. 1) 202-211. https://ojie.um.edu.my/index.php/jummec/article/view/25856/12132
Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., & Sponarski, C. C. (2017). Rethinking internal consistency in cronbach’s alpha. Leisure Sciences, 39(2), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189
Vazsonyi, A. T., Machackova, H., Sevcikova, A., Smahel, D., & Cerna, A. (2012). Cyberbullying in context: Direct and indirect effects by low self-control across 25 European countries. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 210-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.644919
Wang, S. (2021). Standing up or standing by: Bystander intervention in cyberbullying on social media. New Media & Society, 23(6), 1379-1397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820902541
Zhu, Y., Wu, S., Marsiglia, F. F., Wu, Q., & Chen, Q. (2022). Adaptation and validation of the European cyberbullying intervention project questionnaire with and for Chinese adolescents. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(4), 1363-1372. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13466
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ana Paula Monteiro, Daniela Fonseca, Elisete Correia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:











The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 

