Program Theory and Theory of Change In Development Evaluation: A theoretical-practical review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/abra.38-56.2Keywords:
Program theory, theory of change, evaluationAbstract
Unlike other analytical or research exercises, Evaluation –understood as a professional practice– has clear applications and practical uses, which gives it a distinctive feature. Its main functions are the learning of experiences, feedback or improvement, and accountability to financial sources and public opinion involved in development programs. In this sense, the notions of Program Theory and Theory of Change have taken force and have consolidated into this new discipline. Nonetheless, full comprehension of the discipline may present difficulties, particularly for those starting in the field of evaluation, due not only to the myriad theoretical contributions and methodological efforts to apply these concepts, but also to a marked conceptual polysemy. This article reviews the main ideas and arguments related to these two notions and suggests that both concepts are synonymous and serve the interests of evaluation, which makes it a fundamental element in the practical exercise.
References
Bickman, L. (1987a). Editors’s notes. In Bickman, L. (ed). Using Program Theory in Evaluation. New
Directions for Evaluation. Vol 33 (pp 1-3). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Bickman, L. (1987b). The Function of Program Theory. In L. Bickman (ed.). Using Program Theory in
Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, no. 33. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Briggs, B. (1998). “Re:Assessing Program Theory.” Post to discussion list EVALTAK.
Castro, R., y Frías, S. M. (2010). Violencia en el noviazgo. Un grave problema social que podemos
estudiar, erradicar y prevenir. Jóvenes, Revista de Estudios sobre Juventud, pp. 31–41.
Centre of Excellence for Evaluation (2012). Theory-Based Approaches to Evaluation: Concepts and
Practices. Recuperado de: https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/
audit-evaluation/centre-excellence-evaluation/theory-based-approaches-evaluationconcepts-
practices.html.
Chen, H.T. (2005). Practical Program Evaluation: Assessing and improving planning implementation
and effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Chen, H.T. (1990). Theory Driven Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Donaldson, S. I., & Lipsey, M. W. (2014). Roles for theory in evaluation practice. Title: The SAGE Handbook
of Evaluation, (2001), 56–75. https://doi.org/:http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608078.n2.
Donaldson, S.I. (2007). Program Theory-Driven Evaluation Science: Strategies and Applications. Mahwah,
N.J.: Erlbaum.
Fitz-Gibbon, C. T., & Morris, L. L. (1996). Theory-based evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 17(2), 177–184.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90024-0.
Fitz-Gibbon, C. and Morris, L.L. (1975). Theory-Based Evaluation. Evaluation Comment, 5(1), pp. 1-4.
Funnel, S.C. and Rogers, P.J. (2011) Purposeful program theory: effective use of theories of change and
logic models. Jossey Bass, Estados Unidos.
Lipsey, M.W. (1993). Theory as Method: Small Theories of Treatments. In L. Sechrest and A.Scott (eds.),
Understanding Causes and Generalizing About Them. New Directions for Evaluation, no.57.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ministerio de Planificación Nacional –MIDEPLAN- (2017). Guía de la teoría de la intervención.
Orientaciones metodológicas para la evaluación. San José, C.R. Disponible en: www.mideplan.
go.cr.
Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation, Thousand Oaks, California: Sag.
Reigeluth, C.M. (1983). “Institutional Design: what is it and why is it? (3-36). En: C.M.Reigeluth (Ed.).
Instructional-Design. Theories and Models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale. N.J.
Londres: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Rogers, P.J. (2007). “Theory-Based Evaluation: Reflection Ten Years On.” In S. Mathison (ed.), Enduring
Issues in Evaluation: The 20th Anniversary of the Collaboration Between NDE and AEA: New
Directions for Evaluation, no. 114. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.22.
Stufflebeam, D.L. (1967). The Use and Abuse of Evaluation in Title III. Theory into Practice, (1967)6, 126-
Suchman, E. A. (1967). Evaluative Research: Principles and Practice in Public Seruzce and Social Action
Programs. Nueva York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Weiss, C. H. (1997). Theory-based evaluation: Past, present and future. New Directions for Evaluation,
(1997)76, 41-55.
Wholey, J. S. (1987). Evaluability assessment: Developing program theory. New Directions for Program
Evaluation, 1987(33), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1447.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista ABRA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This publication is under a Creative commons attribution NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International and all restrictions and attributions must be regarded.
Authors that publish in this journal agree to grant exclusive, costless, worldwide and timeless ownership of their rights over the paper to Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica.
Revista ABRA by Universidad Nacional is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional License.
Creado a partir de la obra enhttp://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/abra.
