Exploratory teaching of geometry using dynamic geometry software and learning of mathematics teachers: A systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.37-1.27Keywords:
Mathematics education, mathematics teachers education, communities of practice, meta-ethnography, dynamic geometry softwareAbstract
[Objective] This article analyzes the literature related to research on continuing training processes of mathematics teachers, whose objectives are teacher learning, the study of exploratory teaching, or the links between the use of dynamic geometry software (DGS) and professional education. [Methodology] A meta-ethnography of 18 studies published in the period 2001-2021, encountered through searches in databases and mathematics education journals, was carried out. The analysis consisted of three stages: interpretative syntheses of each study; integrative syntheses, based on the recognition of convergences and divergences; and a final synthesis. [Results] In general terms, the review revealed that: (a) the predominant conception of teacher learning is related to participation of teachers in communities of practice; (b) exploratory teaching is compatible with the use of DGS, and its promotion in educational processes usually takes into account the interaction between theoretical and practical activities; and (c) teachers who begin to incorporate DGS into classroom activities may fail to take full advantage of the potential of this instrument for teaching, due to the emergence of unexpected situations during the class, or because of their convictions about the pedagogical use of digital technologies. [Conclusions] Among the most important conclusions, it is clear that incorporation of DGS in the classroom can be successfully achieved through teachers’ progressive and critical awareness of the pedagogical knowledge that supports exploratory teaching as an educational practice.
References
Alqahtani, M. M. & Powell, A. B. (2016). Instrumental appropriation of a collaborative, dynamic-geometry environment and geometrical understanding. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(2), 72-83.
Andrade-Molina, M., Montecino, A. & Aguilar, M. S. (2020). Beyond quality metrics: defying journal rankings as the philosopher’s stone of mathematics education research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(3), 359-374. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09932-9
Artigue, M. & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM, 45, 797-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0506-6
Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., Paola, D., & Robutti, O. (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practises in Cabri environments. ZDM, 34(3), 66-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02655708
Bozkurt, G., & Uygan, C. (2020). Lesson hiccups during the development of teaching schemes: a novice technology-using mathematics teacher’s professional instrumental genesis of dynamic geometry. ZDM, 52(7), 1349-1363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01184-4
Cayton, C., Hollebrands, K., Okumus, S., & Boehm, E. (2017). Pivotal teaching moments in technology-intensive secondary geometry classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(1), 75-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9314-y
Chin, E. T., Lin, Y. C., & Tuan, H. L. (2016). Analyzing changes in four teachers’ knowledge and practice of inquiry-based mathematics teaching. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(5-6), 845-862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0304-3
Dove, A., & Hollenbrands, K. (2014). Teachers’ scaffolding of students’ learning of geometry while using a dynamic geometry program. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(5), 668-681. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.868540
Erfjord, I. (2011). Teachers’ initial orchestration of students’ dynamic geometry software use: consequences for students’ opportunities to learn mathematics. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 16(1), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-011-9176-z
Erwin, E. J., Brotherson, M. J., & Summers, J. A. (2011). Understanding qualitative metasynthesis: issues and opportunities in early childhood intervention research. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(3), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111425493
Fauskanger, J., Ebbelind, A., Friesen, M., Samková, L., Helliwell, T., & Larrain, M. (2022). Introduction to the Thematic Working Group 18: international perspectives on mathematics teacher education and professional development: current and emerging research. In J. Hodgen, E. Geraniou, G. Bolondi, & F. Ferretti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME12) (pp. 3051-3059). Bozen-Bolzano: ERME / Free University of Bozen-Bolzano.
Fiorentini, D., & Crecci, V. M. (2017). Metassíntese de pesquisas sobre conhecimentos/saberes na formação continuada de professores que ensinam matemática. Zetetiké, 25(1), 164-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.20396/zet.v25i1.8647773
Flores, A. H. (2007). Esquemas de argumentación en profesores de matemáticas del bachillerato. Educación Matemática, 19(1), 63-98.
Gama, R. P., & Fiorentini, D. (2009). Formação continuada em grupos colaborativos: professores de matemática iniciantes e as aprendizagens da prática profissional. Educação Matemática Pesquisa, 11(2), 441-461.
Gomes, P., Quaresma, M., & Ponte, J. P. (2021). A lesson study with mathematics teachers: learning about communication in the classroom. Acta Scientiae, 23(5), 126-152. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6666
Graven, M. (2004). Investigating mathematics teacher learning within an in-service community of practice: the centrality of confidence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 177-211. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000049277.40453.4b
Groenwald, C. L. O., & Llinares, S. (2022). Aprendiendo a mirar profesionalmente las situaciones de enseñanza de las matemáticas. Revista Venezolana de Investigación en Educación Matemática (REVIEM), 2(2), e202202. https://doi.org/10.54541/reviem.v2i2.29
Højsted, I. H. (2022). Big questions for research on digital technology in mathematics education. In J. Hodgen, E. Geraniou, G. Bolondi, & F. Ferretti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME12) (pp. 65-68). Bozen-Bolzano: ERME / Free University of Bozen-Bolzano.
Jesus, C. C., Cyrino, M. C. C. T., & Oliveira, H. M. (2020). Mathematics teachers’ learning on exploratory teaching: analysis of a multimedia case in a community of practice. Acta Scientiae, 22(1), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.5566
Knapp, A., Barrett, J., & Moore, C. (2016). Prompting teacher geometric reasoning through coaching in a dynamic geometry software context. School Science and Mathematics, 116(6), 326-337.
Korhonen, A., Hakulinen-Viitanen, T., Jylhä, V., & Holopainen, A. (2012). Meta-synthesis and evidence-based health care – a method for systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 27(4), 1027-1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12003
Laborde, C., & Laborde, J. M. (1995). What about a learning environment where euclidean concepts are manipulated with a mouse? In A. A. diSessa, C. Hoyles, R. Noss, & L. D. Edwards (Eds.), Computers and Exploratory Learning (pp. 241-261). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57799-4_13
Lucena, T. V., & Barbosa, J. C. (2016). Aprendizagens de professores de matemática em um grupo colaborativo. UNIÓN - Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Matemática, (47), 62-80.
Martins, M., Mata-Pereira, J., & Ponte, J. P. (2021). Os desafios da abordagem exploratória no ensino da matemática: aprendizagens de duas futuras professoras através do estudo de aula. Bolema, 35(69), 343-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v35n69a16
Mavani, D., Mavani, B., & Schäfer, M. (2018). A case study of two selected teachers as they integrated dynamic geometry software as a visualisation tool in teaching geometry. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(3), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2018.1522716
Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. (1988). Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985000
Paula, A., & Fiorentini, D. (2021). Aprendizagem e aprendizados de uma professora dos anos iniciais em um contexto de lesson study híbrido. In D. S. Costa, D. M. Brito, K. C. J. F. Costa, M. R. M. Gomes, & P. C. B. Júnior (Eds.), Pesquisas interdisciplinares na Amazônia Tocantina: saberes e fazeres em diálogos (pp. 91-109). Belém: RFB Editora.
Pearson, A., Robertson-Malt, S., & Rittenmeyer, L. (2011). Synthesizing qualitative evidence. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Pocalana, G., Robutti, O., & Liljedahl, P. (2023). Inquiry activities are not for everyone: teachers’ beliefs and professional development. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2176795
Ponte, J. P. (Ed.). (2014). Práticas profissionais dos professores de Matemática. Lisboa: Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa.
Ponte, J. P., Quaresma, M., & Mata-Pereira, J. (2022). Teachers’ learning in lesson study: insights provided by a modified version of the interconnected model of teacher professional growth. ZDM, 54(2), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01367-1
Powell, A. B., & Pazuch, V. (2016). Tarefas e justificativas de professores em ambientes virtuais colaborativos de geometria dinâmica. Zetetiké, 24(2), 191-207. https://doi.org/10.20396/zet.v24i2.8646517
Richit, A., & Ponte, J. P. (2019). A colaboração profissional em estudos de aula na perspectiva de professores participantes. Bolema, 33(64), 937-962. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v33n64a24
Ruthven, K. (2018). Constructing dynamic geometry: insights from a study of teaching practices in english schools. In G. Kaiser, H. Forgasz, M. Graven, A. Kuzniak, E. Simmt, & B. Xu (Eds.), Invited lectures from the 13th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 521-540). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72170-5_29
Santana, E., Serrazina, L., & Nunes, C. (2019). Contribuições de um processo formativo para o desenvolvimento profissional dos professores envolvidos. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 22(1), 11-38.
Shafer, K. G. (2008). Learning to teach with technology through an apprenticeship model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(1), 27-44.
Silva, L. A., Prado, A. S., & Barbosa, J. C. (2016). Narrativas de aulas de matemática: reificações de comunidades de prática. Zetetiké, 24(45), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.20396/zet.v24i45.8646531
Sinclair, N., Bartolini Bussi, M. G., De Villiers, M., Jones, K., Kortenkamp, U., Leung, A., & Owens, K. (2017). Geometry education, including the use of new technologies: a survey of recent research. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, ICME-13 (pp. 277-287). Hamburg: ICMI. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_18
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675
Tinti, D. S., & Manrique, A. L. (2016). Análise de aprendizagens de professores de matemática evidenciadas no estágio potencial de uma comunidade de prática. UNIÓN - Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Matemática, (47), 9-22.
Wood, T. (Ed.). (2008). The International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can set separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. The authors have declared to hold all permissions to use the resources they provided in the paper (images, tables, among others) and assume full responsibility for damages to third parties.
4. The opinions expressed in the paper are the exclusive responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the editors or the Universidad Nacional.
Uniciencia Journal and all its productions are under Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Unported.
There is neither fee for access nor Article Processing Charge (APC)
