PREDATORY JOURNALS: SCIENTIFIC PIRATES
The researchers worldwide have multiple alternatives to publish and disseminate their scientific productions. Hand in hand with the technological development, journals have digitalized their productions; this has been utilized by different pseudoacademic companies to offer their services for profit. This paper will offer some clues to differentiate the journals with quality standards from the so-called predatory journals.
Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342, 60-65. Recuperado de http:// 10.1126/science.342.6154.60
Davis, P. (2009). Open access publisher accepts nonsense manuscript for dollars. Scholarly Kitchen (7 de febrero de 2018). Recuperado de http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/nonsense-for-dollars
McCool, J. (2017). Opinion: Why I published in a predatory journal. The Scientist (6 de abril de 2017). Recuperado de https://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/49071/title/Opinion--Why-I-Published-in-a-Predatory-Journal/
Silver, A. (2017). Controversial website that lists predatory publishers shut down. Nature, 541, 435-436. Recuperado de http://doi:10.1038/nature.2017.21328
Self-archiving policy: The journal allows the self-archiving of the articles in their peer-reviewed version, edited and approved by the Editorial Board of the Journal to be available in Open Access through the Internet. More information in the following link: https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/25815https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/25815
The journal is hosted in open access repositories such as the Institutional Repository of the Universidad Nacional, the Kimuk Repository of Costa Rica and La Referencia.
The editorial source must be recognized.
MHSalud: Journal in Human Movement Sciences and Health by the Universidad Nacional is cover under a Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Costa Rica license.