Keywords: journal, science, ethics


The researchers worldwide have multiple alternatives to publish and disseminate their scientific productions. Hand in hand with the technological development, journals have digitalized their productions; this has been utilized by different pseudoacademic companies to offer their services for profit. This paper will offer some clues to differentiate the journals with quality standards from the so-called predatory journals.


Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489, 179. Recuperado de http://doi:10.1038/489179a
Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342, 60-65. Recuperado de http:// 10.1126/science.342.6154.60

Davis, P. (2009). Open access publisher accepts nonsense manuscript for dollars. Scholarly Kitchen (7 de febrero de 2018). Recuperado de

McCool, J. (2017). Opinion: Why I published in a predatory journal. The Scientist (6 de abril de 2017). Recuperado de

Silver, A. (2017). Controversial website that lists predatory publishers shut down. Nature, 541, 435-436. Recuperado de http://doi:10.1038/nature.2017.21328
How to Cite
Rojas-Valerde, D. (2018). PREDATORY JOURNALS: SCIENTIFIC PIRATES. MHSalud: Revista En Ciencias Del Movimiento Humano Y Salud, 15(2), 1-4.

Comentarios (ver términos de uso)